Systematic Review Comparing Nonoperative Management to Surgical Treatment of Acute Appendicitis in the Presence of a Retained Faecolith

Export Objective: The main management of acute appendicitis has typically been appendicectomy rather than the nonoperative approach. Nonoperative management showcases fewer complications but comes with the risk of relapse that leads to conversion to surgery. Acute appendicitis is correlated to faecolith presence in 13%–16% of cases. There is a controversy regarding the failure of conservative treatment in the presence of faecolith. This systematic review is to study the success of conservative treatment in appendicitis with faecolith existence. Methods: The Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) framework was used. Population: Acute appendicitis with faecolith at any age or gender (excluding complicated appendicitis, cases with comorbidities, and appendicitis without faecolith). Intervention: Nonoperative treatment with antibiotics. Comparison: Surgical appendicectomy was compared to nonoperative management. Outcome: Complications that need intervention or surgery within one month are considered a failure. Results: Search through (PubMed, BMJ, Research Gate, Elsevier, and Google Scholar) collected 65 records. Records after duplicate removal were 58. Screened against title and abstracts were 58. Excluded after screening against title and abstract was 49 (no appendicitis in 2, no fecalith in 27, complicated in 8, guidelines without patients data in 11, and case reports in 1. Articles assessed for eligibility were 9. The final texts included in the systemic review were 9. The total number of patients was 2336. The patients included were 731. Data from 86 patients were not complete (excluded). Nonoperative treatment was in 381 patients, with success in 221 (58%) and failure in 123 (32.28%), lost to follow 37 (9.7%). Surgical treatment was in 264 patients, success in 242 (91.66%), and failure in 22 (8.3%). Conclusions: Surgical treatment of faecolith in acute appendicitis is more successful than nonoperative treatment. Nonoperative treatment was successful in 58% of patients, but surgical management had a success rate of 91.7%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arab Board Medical Journal
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/abmj.abmj_47_24
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic Review Comparing Nonoperative Management to Surgical Treatment of Acute Appendicitis in the Presence of a Retained Faecolith

Elaf MO Suliman, Kowthar Forsat, Haya Elastal, Mesk Alhammadi et al.
Arab Board Medical Journal
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

Systematic Review Comparing Nonoperative Management to Surgical Treatment of Acute Appendicitis in the Presence of a Retained Faecolith

Elaf MO Suliman, Kowthar Forsat, Haya Elastal, Mesk Alhammadi, Sanjida Afrin, Amer Al-Ani, Yara Walid Elsherbiny, Nada Khaled Matar, Fethiya Abdu, Wafa Ibrahim, Ahmad Al Amour, Bashir Saddig
article en

Abstract

Export Objective: The main management of acute appendicitis has typically been appendicectomy rather than the nonoperative approach. Nonoperative management showcases fewer complications but comes with the risk of relapse that leads to conversion to surgery. Acute appendicitis is correlated to faecolith presence in 13%–16% of cases. There is a controversy regarding the failure of conservative treatment in the presence of faecolith. This systematic review is to study the success of conservative treatment in appendicitis with faecolith existence. Methods: The Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) framework was used. Population: Acute appendicitis with faecolith at any age or gender (excluding complicated appendicitis, cases with comorbidities, and appendicitis without faecolith). Intervention: Nonoperative treatment with antibiotics. Comparison: Surgical appendicectomy was compared to nonoperative management. Outcome: Complications that need intervention or surgery within one month are considered a failure. Results: Search through (PubMed, BMJ, Research Gate, Elsevier, and Google Scholar) collected 65 records. Records after duplicate removal were 58. Screened against title and abstracts were 58. Excluded after screening against title and abstract was 49 (no appendicitis in 2, no fecalith in 27, complicated in 8, guidelines without patients data in 11, and case reports in 1. Articles assessed for eligibility were 9. The final texts included in the systemic review were 9. The total number of patients was 2336. The patients included were 731. Data from 86 patients were not complete (excluded). Nonoperative treatment was in 381 patients, with success in 221 (58%) and failure in 123 (32.28%), lost to follow 37 (9.7%). Surgical treatment was in 264 patients, success in 242 (91.66%), and failure in 22 (8.3%). Conclusions: Surgical treatment of faecolith in acute appendicitis is more successful than nonoperative treatment. Nonoperative treatment was successful in 58% of patients, but surgical management had a success rate of 91.7%.

Arab Board Medical JournalVol. 26(2)
Ajman University (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.