Development and validation and risk factor analysis of the colorectal cancer psychosocial distress scale

Psychosocial distress is a key factor affecting the quality of life (QOL) and treatment outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Owing to the lack of clinically integrated and validated screening tools, the current practice of screening CRC patients for psychosocial distress is inconsistent. This study aimed to create and assess a CRC Psychosocial Distress Scale (CRCPDS) as a working standard for the clinical screening of psychosocial distress levels in CRC patients. Based on the improved classical test theory, 59 patients with CRC were recruited to develop the CRCPDS and 441 patients were recruited to validate the CRCPDS. Delphi expert consultation and item analysis were used to improve the CRCPDS, and validate its reliability and validity using factor analysis and structural equation model. The CRCPDS consisted of 14 items and was divided into three subscales: 7 items for ostomy pouch stigma, 3 items for self-deprecation, and 4 items for social isolation. The CRCPDS demonstrated strong validity (I-FVIs > 0.85, I-CVIs > 0.80; CVCR = 76.832%, AVE > 0.50, CR > 0.70; RMSEA = 0.062, GFI = 0.923, CFI = 0.972, NFI = 0.942, IFI = 0.973, TLI = 0.964) and reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.949, Spearman-Brown coefficient = 0.929, ICC = 0.865). Patients under 60 years old, economically disadvantaged, post colostomy, and introverted had stronger psychosocial distress (P < 0.05), and those with greater psychosocial distress reported a lower QOL (P < 0.01). CRC patients generally experience significant psychosocial distress, and the CRCPDS is effective and reliable in the early identification of psychosocial distress. It provides a standard for assessing the level of psychosocial distress and is suitable for implementation into clinical screening workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41906-4
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation and risk factor analysis of the colorectal cancer psychosocial distress scale

Wang Xuexing, Liu Zhijin, CHU Jie, Gan Lin et al.
Scientific Reports
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Development and validation and risk factor analysis of the colorectal cancer psychosocial distress scale

Wang Xuexing, Liu Zhijin, CHU Jie, Gan Lin, Shao Yanyan, Chen Aiyan, Zhang Rong, Yang Lirong
article en

Abstract

Psychosocial distress is a key factor affecting the quality of life (QOL) and treatment outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Owing to the lack of clinically integrated and validated screening tools, the current practice of screening CRC patients for psychosocial distress is inconsistent. This study aimed to create and assess a CRC Psychosocial Distress Scale (CRCPDS) as a working standard for the clinical screening of psychosocial distress levels in CRC patients. Based on the improved classical test theory, 59 patients with CRC were recruited to develop the CRCPDS and 441 patients were recruited to validate the CRCPDS. Delphi expert consultation and item analysis were used to improve the CRCPDS, and validate its reliability and validity using factor analysis and structural equation model. The CRCPDS consisted of 14 items and was divided into three subscales: 7 items for ostomy pouch stigma, 3 items for self-deprecation, and 4 items for social isolation. The CRCPDS demonstrated strong validity (I-FVIs > 0.85, I-CVIs > 0.80; CVCR = 76.832%, AVE > 0.50, CR > 0.70; RMSEA = 0.062, GFI = 0.923, CFI = 0.972, NFI = 0.942, IFI = 0.973, TLI = 0.964) and reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.949, Spearman-Brown coefficient = 0.929, ICC = 0.865). Patients under 60 years old, economically disadvantaged, post colostomy, and introverted had stronger psychosocial distress (P < 0.05), and those with greater psychosocial distress reported a lower QOL (P < 0.01). CRC patients generally experience significant psychosocial distress, and the CRCPDS is effective and reliable in the early identification of psychosocial distress. It provides a standard for assessing the level of psychosocial distress and is suitable for implementation into clinical screening workflows.

Scientific Reports
Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN), Nanchang University (CN), Sichuan University (CN), Kunming Medical University (CN), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN), First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province (CN), Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (CN), The First Hospital of Kunming (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (CN), Honghe University (CN)
Nanchang University, Health Commission of Jiangxi Province
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.