Supporting the implementation of a Maternal Early Warning System (MEWS) protocol using Human-Centred Design

Maternal Early Warning System (MEWS) protocols enable a systematic and standardized approach to medical emergencies in pregnancy. Such protocols have been associated with a decrease in severe maternal morbidity and related inequities. However, MEWS protocols are complex to implement. We adopted a Human-centred design (HCD) approach to support the implementation of a MEWS protocol at a tertiary care centre. In Phase I (Discover), we aimed to understand the needs, challenges, and desires of clinicians, as well as persons with lived experience (PWLE) of pregnancy and support people, in order to identify gaps in care and generate ideas for potential solutions. In Phase II (Design), we validated findings, co-created sustainable solutions to be tested, and engaged in collaborative work to shape the future implementation. In Phase III (Prepare), we equipped the clinical team with resources for upcoming implementation. Across these phases, we organized 10 interactive activities (including semi-structured interviews, an asynchronous activity, and online/in-person group sessions) with clinicians and PWLE of pregnancy and support people. An Advisory Sharing Circle, focusing on health equity and inclusivity, shared insights and provided feedback that was integrated throughout the project. In total, 38 clinicians and 8 PWLE and support people participated in planned activities. We identified several care gaps that would need to be addressed to optimize implementation of the MEWS protocol, including opportunities to improve communications, documentation, and collaboration. PWLE and support people wanted to be empowered with information, participate in specific tasks, and have more agency in their care. We co-developed solutions to facilitate upcoming implementation, including a mechanism for patient-led activation of the MEWS protocol, and visual resources to encourage patients and support people to share any concerns. We also created a quick reference guide with action and education items to prepare the clinical team. Using HCD, we successfully engaged with knowledge users, including clinicians, PWLE, and support people, to plan the implementation a MEWS protocol into clinical care. This novel approach, fostering a justice framework, has the potential to reduce the knowledge-to-action gap and enhance sustainability by co-developing solutions with those directly impacted by the problem and change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14128-7
Primary Topic
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting the implementation of a Maternal Early Warning System (MEWS) protocol using Human-Centred Design

Michelle Jing Si Wan, Brianna Ghali, R.A. Fortune, Karen Lawford et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
article

Supporting the implementation of a Maternal Early Warning System (MEWS) protocol using Human-Centred Design

Michelle Jing Si Wan, Brianna Ghali, R.A. Fortune, Karen Lawford, Sophia Kapellas, Saraswathi Vedam, Modupe Tunde‐Byass, Melissa Frew, Kylie Campbell-Clarke, Ali Tatum, Suzanne Deliscar, Robert Finch, Stéphanie Cérat, Cynthia Maxwell, Isabelle Malhamé, Diane Simon, Rohan D’Souza, Kate Mazzietti, Emily Sugars, Sabrina Haas, Ingrid Nielssen, Nicole Williams, Ashley Spiegel, Michelle Stimson, Millie Tresierra, Donalee Mc Intyre, Fatima Awwad, Anne-Maude Morency
article en

Abstract

Maternal Early Warning System (MEWS) protocols enable a systematic and standardized approach to medical emergencies in pregnancy. Such protocols have been associated with a decrease in severe maternal morbidity and related inequities. However, MEWS protocols are complex to implement. We adopted a Human-centred design (HCD) approach to support the implementation of a MEWS protocol at a tertiary care centre. In Phase I (Discover), we aimed to understand the needs, challenges, and desires of clinicians, as well as persons with lived experience (PWLE) of pregnancy and support people, in order to identify gaps in care and generate ideas for potential solutions. In Phase II (Design), we validated findings, co-created sustainable solutions to be tested, and engaged in collaborative work to shape the future implementation. In Phase III (Prepare), we equipped the clinical team with resources for upcoming implementation. Across these phases, we organized 10 interactive activities (including semi-structured interviews, an asynchronous activity, and online/in-person group sessions) with clinicians and PWLE of pregnancy and support people. An Advisory Sharing Circle, focusing on health equity and inclusivity, shared insights and provided feedback that was integrated throughout the project. In total, 38 clinicians and 8 PWLE and support people participated in planned activities. We identified several care gaps that would need to be addressed to optimize implementation of the MEWS protocol, including opportunities to improve communications, documentation, and collaboration. PWLE and support people wanted to be empowered with information, participate in specific tasks, and have more agency in their care. We co-developed solutions to facilitate upcoming implementation, including a mechanism for patient-led activation of the MEWS protocol, and visual resources to encourage patients and support people to share any concerns. We also created a quick reference guide with action and education items to prepare the clinical team. Using HCD, we successfully engaged with knowledge users, including clinicians, PWLE, and support people, to plan the implementation a MEWS protocol into clinical care. This novel approach, fostering a justice framework, has the potential to reduce the knowledge-to-action gap and enhance sustainability by co-developing solutions with those directly impacted by the problem and change.

BMC Health Services ResearchVol. 26(1)
University Health Network (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), North York General Hospital (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Women's College Hospital (CA), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CA), McGill University (CA), Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA), Hamilton Health Sciences (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.