Patient-reported financial toxicity within Italian public healthcare system: A cross-sectional analysis in patients with cancer

From October 2024 to December 2024, 359 patients filled in PROFFIT. Median PROFFIT score (0-100 scale) was 33.3 (IQR 14.3-52.4). One hundred and twenty five patients (35%) declared that illness reduced their financial resources. One hundred and three patients (29%) felt that their economic situation affects the possibility of receiving medical care; 124 (35%) felt that National Health Service does not cover all disease costs; 162 (46%) declared payments for private medical exams, 204 (56%) for additional medicines/supplements, 144 (40%) for additional treatments. PROFFIT score was significantly higher in younger patients, in those with worse educational level, in divorced/unmarried patients, in those with economically dependent family members, and in unemployed patients. PROFFIT score was higher for patients with a longer distance to travel to the hospital, although it was not statistically significant. At multivariate analysis, characteristics associated with PROFFIT score were educational level, economically dependent family members, employment status and time from diagnosis; PROFFIT determinants associated with PROFFIT score were payments for additional medicines, payments for additional treatments and travel expenses.ConclusionsEven within the Italian public health system, FT is not negligible among patients with cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tumori Journal
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03008916261417280
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient-reported financial toxicity within Italian public healthcare system: A cross-sectional analysis in patients with cancer

F. Perrone, Gloria Mittica, Anna Amela Valsecchi, Massimo Di Maio et al.
Tumori Journal
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Patient-reported financial toxicity within Italian public healthcare system: A cross-sectional analysis in patients with cancer

F. Perrone, Gloria Mittica, Anna Amela Valsecchi, Massimo Di Maio, Giorgia Novero, Chiara Pallisco, A. Beano, Paola Sabbadini, Maria Laura Malgarini, Marinella Mistrangelo, Silvia Beatrice, Pamela Festa
article en

Abstract

From October 2024 to December 2024, 359 patients filled in PROFFIT. Median PROFFIT score (0-100 scale) was 33.3 (IQR 14.3-52.4). One hundred and twenty five patients (35%) declared that illness reduced their financial resources. One hundred and three patients (29%) felt that their economic situation affects the possibility of receiving medical care; 124 (35%) felt that National Health Service does not cover all disease costs; 162 (46%) declared payments for private medical exams, 204 (56%) for additional medicines/supplements, 144 (40%) for additional treatments. PROFFIT score was significantly higher in younger patients, in those with worse educational level, in divorced/unmarried patients, in those with economically dependent family members, and in unemployed patients. PROFFIT score was higher for patients with a longer distance to travel to the hospital, although it was not statistically significant. At multivariate analysis, characteristics associated with PROFFIT score were educational level, economically dependent family members, employment status and time from diagnosis; PROFFIT determinants associated with PROFFIT score were payments for additional medicines, payments for additional treatments and travel expenses.ConclusionsEven within the Italian public health system, FT is not negligible among patients with cancer.

Tumori Journal
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), Fondazione Ricerca Molinette (IT), Ospedale Sant'Anna (IT), Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.