“Why our voices don’t count”: The employment experiences of neurodivergent employees through a double empathy lens

This article aims to understand the employment experiences of neurodivergent employees through the lens of the double empathy problem. We draw on 25 semi-structured interviews with neurodivergent workers in France and used a grounded theory approach to analyze the data. The findings demonstrate that the stigma associated with neurodivergence coupled with the double empathy problem can influence neurodivergent employees to engage in camouflaging as a means of avoiding these negative reactions from others. This, in turn, leads to reduced well-being and a perceived lack of organizational support on behalf of neurodivergent employees. Ultimately, this cycle can diminish the voices of neurodivergent employees as they feel misunderstood, mistreated, and stigmatized, which reduces their confidence and efficacy in voicing their ideas. Additionally, organizations may overlook the unique capabilities and strengths of this population, failing to seek out or encourage their voices to be heard. This study fills gaps in the literature by studying the double empathy problem in a workplace context and by showing that the double empathy problem can be extended beyond individuals with autism to explain (mis)communication between neurotypical and neurodivergent employees. The findings further underscore how it may unintentionally maintain and reinforce neurotypical hegemony and privilege in organizations as it positions neurodivergent individuals as dysfunctional and inferior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organization
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084241295747
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Why our voices don’t count”: The employment experiences of neurodivergent employees through a double empathy lens

Sophie Hennekam, Kayla B. Follmer
Organization
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

“Why our voices don’t count”: The employment experiences of neurodivergent employees through a double empathy lens

Sophie Hennekam, Kayla B. Follmer
article en

Abstract

This article aims to understand the employment experiences of neurodivergent employees through the lens of the double empathy problem. We draw on 25 semi-structured interviews with neurodivergent workers in France and used a grounded theory approach to analyze the data. The findings demonstrate that the stigma associated with neurodivergence coupled with the double empathy problem can influence neurodivergent employees to engage in camouflaging as a means of avoiding these negative reactions from others. This, in turn, leads to reduced well-being and a perceived lack of organizational support on behalf of neurodivergent employees. Ultimately, this cycle can diminish the voices of neurodivergent employees as they feel misunderstood, mistreated, and stigmatized, which reduces their confidence and efficacy in voicing their ideas. Additionally, organizations may overlook the unique capabilities and strengths of this population, failing to seek out or encourage their voices to be heard. This study fills gaps in the literature by studying the double empathy problem in a workplace context and by showing that the double empathy problem can be extended beyond individuals with autism to explain (mis)communication between neurotypical and neurodivergent employees. The findings further underscore how it may unintentionally maintain and reinforce neurotypical hegemony and privilege in organizations as it positions neurodivergent individuals as dysfunctional and inferior.

OrganizationVol. 33(2)
West Virginia University (US), Audencia Business School (FR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.