Development and validation of a risk assessment model for post-surgical scar formation in pediatric melanocytic nevus excision: a retrospective cohort study

Scar-related complications remain a significant concern following melanocytic nevus excision in children. However, validated risk prediction tools for this specific population are lacking. This study aimed to develop and validate a prediction model for unfavorable scar formation after pediatric melanocytic nevus excision. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from March 2024 to August 2024. Pediatric patients who underwent melanocytic nevus excision were included. Patients were classified into favorable and unfavorable scar groups based on morphological characteristics, POSAS scores, and persistent symptoms. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent risk factors, and a nomogram was constructed. Model performance was evaluated using discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis, with internal validation via bootstrap resampling. Among 300 patients, 73 (24.3%) developed unfavorable scars. Six independent predictors were identified: older age was protective (OR = 0.871), while congenital nevus type (OR = 2.280), larger diameter (OR = 1.818), trunk location (OR = 4.536), extremity location (OR = 3.314), high wound tension (OR = 8.365), moderate wound tension (OR = 2.971), and junctional depth (OR = 2.050) increased the risk. The model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC = 0.839; bootstrap-corrected AUC = 0.821) and calibration (Brier score = 0.132, calibration slope = 0.968). At the optimal threshold, sensitivity was 0.753 and specificity was 0.834. Decision curve analysis confirmed clinical utility across threshold probabilities of 0.10–0.80. This prediction model incorporating six clinical factors may facilitate perioperative risk stratification and informed consent discussions for pediatric patients undergoing melanocytic nevus excision. External validation is warranted before clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pediatrics
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-026-06629-5
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a risk assessment model for post-surgical scar formation in pediatric melanocytic nevus excision: a retrospective cohort study

Dingxiang Liu, Chang Qu, Qide Xu, Huiwen Zhang et al.
BMC Pediatrics
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

Development and validation of a risk assessment model for post-surgical scar formation in pediatric melanocytic nevus excision: a retrospective cohort study

Dingxiang Liu, Chang Qu, Qide Xu, Huiwen Zhang, Lanjing Zhang
article en

Abstract

Scar-related complications remain a significant concern following melanocytic nevus excision in children. However, validated risk prediction tools for this specific population are lacking. This study aimed to develop and validate a prediction model for unfavorable scar formation after pediatric melanocytic nevus excision. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from March 2024 to August 2024. Pediatric patients who underwent melanocytic nevus excision were included. Patients were classified into favorable and unfavorable scar groups based on morphological characteristics, POSAS scores, and persistent symptoms. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent risk factors, and a nomogram was constructed. Model performance was evaluated using discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis, with internal validation via bootstrap resampling. Among 300 patients, 73 (24.3%) developed unfavorable scars. Six independent predictors were identified: older age was protective (OR = 0.871), while congenital nevus type (OR = 2.280), larger diameter (OR = 1.818), trunk location (OR = 4.536), extremity location (OR = 3.314), high wound tension (OR = 8.365), moderate wound tension (OR = 2.971), and junctional depth (OR = 2.050) increased the risk. The model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC = 0.839; bootstrap-corrected AUC = 0.821) and calibration (Brier score = 0.132, calibration slope = 0.968). At the optimal threshold, sensitivity was 0.753 and specificity was 0.834. Decision curve analysis confirmed clinical utility across threshold probabilities of 0.10–0.80. This prediction model incorporating six clinical factors may facilitate perioperative risk stratification and informed consent discussions for pediatric patients undergoing melanocytic nevus excision. External validation is warranted before clinical implementation.

BMC Pediatrics
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), Beijing Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.