Traitorous translators: translation, performance, and democratic language in Meiji Japan

I look at how women’s roles in political life were transformed in the culture of Japan’s Meiji period. This transformation came about as new translation words, like “rights” and “citizen” were coming into use. Gender discourse became enmeshed with these concepts in the speechmaking of the famous Freedom and Popular Rights Movement activist Kishida Toshiko. Kishida reworked the Confucian ideas of womanly duty found in texts like Kaibara Ekken’s Greater Learning for Women to create a new vision of citizenship. However, Kishida did not actually provide a rhetorical argument in favor of women’s rights. In fact, her words recommend against full political rights for women. Nonetheless, her speeches caused the government considered her a traitor. I argue that what is important was not what she said when but how she performed “rights” and “citizenship.” I conclude that new, democratic, translation requires physical performance to make it socially impactful in its new context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Political Science
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2026.1724405
Primary Topic
Japanese History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Traitorous translators: translation, performance, and democratic language in Meiji Japan

John Branstetter
Frontiers in Political Science
Japanese History and Culture
article

Traitorous translators: translation, performance, and democratic language in Meiji Japan

John Branstetter
article en

Abstract

I look at how women’s roles in political life were transformed in the culture of Japan’s Meiji period. This transformation came about as new translation words, like “rights” and “citizen” were coming into use. Gender discourse became enmeshed with these concepts in the speechmaking of the famous Freedom and Popular Rights Movement activist Kishida Toshiko. Kishida reworked the Confucian ideas of womanly duty found in texts like Kaibara Ekken’s Greater Learning for Women to create a new vision of citizenship. However, Kishida did not actually provide a rhetorical argument in favor of women’s rights. In fact, her words recommend against full political rights for women. Nonetheless, her speeches caused the government considered her a traitor. I argue that what is important was not what she said when but how she performed “rights” and “citizenship.” I conclude that new, democratic, translation requires physical performance to make it socially impactful in its new context.

Frontiers in Political ScienceVol. 8
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Japanese History and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.