Country-level instability is related to a stronger perceived climate of polarization across 44 countries

Deep-seated partisan animosity and aversion present challenges across the global political landscape, yet little is known about how individuals perceive the climate of polarization in their societies or the broader societal conditions that shape these perceptions. Drawing on a dataset spanning 44 countries (N = 8917), we examined how macro-level indicators of dysfunction and disruption relate to the perceived climate of polarization - that is, the degree to which people believe major voter groups in their society dislike, distrust, and distance themselves from one another. We also tested whether perceptions of anomie in society - specifically, a perceived breakdown in the leadership and social fabric - may partially explain these relationships. Our analyses revealed stronger perceptions of partisan antipathy and distance in countries facing conditions linked to broader systemic instability, including high economic inequality, violence, weak governance, and a fragmented digital media landscape. Perceptions of anomie in society may partially explain these links. By contrast, no significant associations were found for environmental and public health indicators or the strength of democracy. These results suggest perceptions of a polarized societal climate may be linked to dysfunctional and disruptive economic, political, governmental, and social conditions that spark a felt sense of instability and disorder.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Psychology
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-026-00422-x
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Country-level instability is related to a stronger perceived climate of polarization across 44 countries

Kelly Kirkland, Amy S G Lee, Brock Bastian
Communications Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Country-level instability is related to a stronger perceived climate of polarization across 44 countries

Kelly Kirkland, Amy S G Lee, Brock Bastian
article en

Abstract

Deep-seated partisan animosity and aversion present challenges across the global political landscape, yet little is known about how individuals perceive the climate of polarization in their societies or the broader societal conditions that shape these perceptions. Drawing on a dataset spanning 44 countries (N = 8917), we examined how macro-level indicators of dysfunction and disruption relate to the perceived climate of polarization - that is, the degree to which people believe major voter groups in their society dislike, distrust, and distance themselves from one another. We also tested whether perceptions of anomie in society - specifically, a perceived breakdown in the leadership and social fabric - may partially explain these relationships. Our analyses revealed stronger perceptions of partisan antipathy and distance in countries facing conditions linked to broader systemic instability, including high economic inequality, violence, weak governance, and a fragmented digital media landscape. Perceptions of anomie in society may partially explain these links. By contrast, no significant associations were found for environmental and public health indicators or the strength of democracy. These results suggest perceptions of a polarized societal climate may be linked to dysfunctional and disruptive economic, political, governmental, and social conditions that spark a felt sense of instability and disorder.

Communications Psychology
The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU)
University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.