Formative assessment for knowledge cultivation in university EFL classrooms: a systematic review from higher education

Formative assessment has become a concern in language testing and applied linguistics, yet conceptual and empirical gaps remain regarding its enactment in EFL higher education. Hence, this review addresses these gaps by synthesizing empirical evidence on how formative assessment supports knowledge construction, diagnostic insight, and pedagogical decision-making in English language classrooms. Guided by PRISMA-ScR procedures, peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2025 were retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC using Boolean search strings combining terms for formative assessment, feedback, and EFL higher education. After applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 67 empirical studies were retained for thematic synthesis. Three overarching patterns emerged. First, formative assessment consistently functions as a diagnostic process through which teachers and students identify learning gaps, monitor developing competencies, and adjust instruction or strategies based on evidence. Second, feedback and feedforward mechanisms, particularly within Assessment as Learning, play a central role in developing metacognition, self-regulation, and goal orientation, although their quality and dialogic character vary considerably. Third, teacher assessment literacy strongly shapes the coherence and impact of formative assessment, with substantial variation in how assessment principles are understood, operationalised, and integrated. Despite contextual differences, most studies report positive influences on learner engagement, linguistic development, and perceived academic progress. The review concludes by arguing for closer alignment between formative assessment practices and core constructs in language assessment—especially diagnostic validity, feedback quality, and classroom-based assessment—and for targeted enhancement of teacher assessment literacy to support coherent, evidence-based implementation in EFL higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language Testing in Asia
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-026-00430-y
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Formative assessment for knowledge cultivation in university EFL classrooms: a systematic review from higher education

Nhat Quang Nguyen, Linh Phuong Nguyen
Language Testing in Asia
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Formative assessment for knowledge cultivation in university EFL classrooms: a systematic review from higher education

Nhat Quang Nguyen, Linh Phuong Nguyen
article en

Abstract

Formative assessment has become a concern in language testing and applied linguistics, yet conceptual and empirical gaps remain regarding its enactment in EFL higher education. Hence, this review addresses these gaps by synthesizing empirical evidence on how formative assessment supports knowledge construction, diagnostic insight, and pedagogical decision-making in English language classrooms. Guided by PRISMA-ScR procedures, peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2025 were retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC using Boolean search strings combining terms for formative assessment, feedback, and EFL higher education. After applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 67 empirical studies were retained for thematic synthesis. Three overarching patterns emerged. First, formative assessment consistently functions as a diagnostic process through which teachers and students identify learning gaps, monitor developing competencies, and adjust instruction or strategies based on evidence. Second, feedback and feedforward mechanisms, particularly within Assessment as Learning, play a central role in developing metacognition, self-regulation, and goal orientation, although their quality and dialogic character vary considerably. Third, teacher assessment literacy strongly shapes the coherence and impact of formative assessment, with substantial variation in how assessment principles are understood, operationalised, and integrated. Despite contextual differences, most studies report positive influences on learner engagement, linguistic development, and perceived academic progress. The review concludes by arguing for closer alignment between formative assessment practices and core constructs in language assessment—especially diagnostic validity, feedback quality, and classroom-based assessment—and for targeted enhancement of teacher assessment literacy to support coherent, evidence-based implementation in EFL higher education.

Language Testing in AsiaVol. 16(1)
Ho Chi Minh University of Banking (VN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.