Evaluating the accuracy of ChatGPT model versions for giving care-seeking advice

Although newer increasingly provide self-care advice, their accuracy remains insufficient for standalone use. However, making use of output variability with aggregation algorithms can improve the performance of existing models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Medicine
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01466-0
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the accuracy of ChatGPT model versions for giving care-seeking advice

Markus A. Feufel, Marvin Kopka, Longqi He
Communications Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Evaluating the accuracy of ChatGPT model versions for giving care-seeking advice

Markus A. Feufel, Marvin Kopka, Longqi He
article en

Abstract

Although newer increasingly provide self-care advice, their accuracy remains insufficient for standalone use. However, making use of output variability with aggregation algorithms can improve the performance of existing models.

Communications MedicineVol. 6(1)
Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.