Comparison of corneal thickness measured using the new Revo FC optical coherence tomographer and the pentacam Scheimpflug-based imaging system

Corneal thickness is a key measurement in ophthalmology, playing a significant role in diagnosing and monitoring conditions such as keratoconus, corneal dystrophies, and glaucoma, as well as in the preoperative evaluation for refractive surgery and keratoplasty. This study aimed to compare corneal thickness measurements obtained using a Scheimpflug-based imaging system with a new optical coherence tomographer. This prospective study enrolled Polish patients with healthy eyes. Measurements were performed using the two devices, the Oculus Pentacam and Optopol Revo FC, in a random sequence. The agreement between the devices was evaluated using correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman analysis, and a paired t-test. A total of 74 patients were examined. The central corneal thickness measured by Pentacam was 545.52 ± 30.16 μm, while 539.36 ± 30.16 μm for Revo FC (difference 5.52 μm; 95% CI: 4.42 to 6.61; p < 0.01). The thinnest corneal location measured by Pentacam was 540.93 ± 30.20 μm, while 531.04 ± 30.24 μm for Revo FC (difference 9.27 μm; 95% CI: 7.29 to 10.76; p< 0.01). However, the strong intraclass correlation coefficients (0.99 for central and 0.98 for minimum corneal thickness) indicate a high level of agreement between the two imaging systems. This study demonstrated that corneal thickness measurements with Pentacam were greater than with Revo FC OCT. Although highly correlated, the results cannot be considered interchangeable as the mean differences exceeded clinically acceptable limits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Ophthalmology
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-026-04658-3
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of corneal thickness measured using the new Revo FC optical coherence tomographer and the pentacam Scheimpflug-based imaging system

Piotr Kanclerz, Zuzanna Zajaczkowska, Julia Tubis
BMC Ophthalmology
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Comparison of corneal thickness measured using the new Revo FC optical coherence tomographer and the pentacam Scheimpflug-based imaging system

Piotr Kanclerz, Zuzanna Zajaczkowska, Julia Tubis
article en

Abstract

Corneal thickness is a key measurement in ophthalmology, playing a significant role in diagnosing and monitoring conditions such as keratoconus, corneal dystrophies, and glaucoma, as well as in the preoperative evaluation for refractive surgery and keratoplasty. This study aimed to compare corneal thickness measurements obtained using a Scheimpflug-based imaging system with a new optical coherence tomographer. This prospective study enrolled Polish patients with healthy eyes. Measurements were performed using the two devices, the Oculus Pentacam and Optopol Revo FC, in a random sequence. The agreement between the devices was evaluated using correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman analysis, and a paired t-test. A total of 74 patients were examined. The central corneal thickness measured by Pentacam was 545.52 ± 30.16 μm, while 539.36 ± 30.16 μm for Revo FC (difference 5.52 μm; 95% CI: 4.42 to 6.61; p < 0.01). The thinnest corneal location measured by Pentacam was 540.93 ± 30.20 μm, while 531.04 ± 30.24 μm for Revo FC (difference 9.27 μm; 95% CI: 7.29 to 10.76; p< 0.01). However, the strong intraclass correlation coefficients (0.99 for central and 0.98 for minimum corneal thickness) indicate a high level of agreement between the two imaging systems. This study demonstrated that corneal thickness measurements with Pentacam were greater than with Revo FC OCT. Although highly correlated, the results cannot be considered interchangeable as the mean differences exceeded clinically acceptable limits.

BMC OphthalmologyVol. 26(1)
University of Helsinki (FI), University of Gdańsk (PL), Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.