ERBITAG: Non-interventional study on the efficacy of cetuximab in first-line therapy in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a difficult-to-treat disease with poor clinical outcomes. Systemic chemotherapy in combination with targeted anti-EGFR therapy has expanded the treatment options for mCRC. However, the therapeutic efficacy of anti-EGFR regimens and relevant prognostic factors vary according to age, performance status and tumor location. The non-interventional ERBITAG study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab in first-line therapy in RAS WT mCRC patients under routine clinical practice. ERBITAG is a non-interventional study of wild-type (WT) RAS mCRC patients initiating a first-line therapy with cetuximab from 2010 to 2018. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Maier methods. χ²-test was used to compare selected categorial variables. Of a total of 728 patients included, baseline characteristics were: median 67 years, male sex 69%, ECOG performance status ≤ 1 81.3%, left-sided tumors 64.5%, liver metastasis 73.4% and prior hepatic metastasis resection before cetuximab-based treatment 16.4%. Median PFS was 10.9 months, median OS was 23.6 months and ORR was 58.0%. Resection rate of liver and/or lung metastases under cetuximab-based therapy was 13.9% and 18.9% of liver metastases. The most common treatment-emergent event (TEAE) was acne-like rash (all grades: 46.8%; grade 3–4: 4.7%). Subgroup analysis showed better outcomes in younger patients (ORR, OS), patients with left-sided tumors (ORR, PFS, OS) and lower grade tumors (ORR, PFS, OS), patients with resected liver and/or lung metastases (PFS, OS) and patients with treatment breaks (OS). Skin prophylaxis with systemic antibiotics and/or topical steroids (ORR, OS, PFS) was associated with better outcomes. The ERBITAG study provides insights into the use of cetuximab in a large RAS WT mCRC cohort in real-life clinical practice in Germany. Cetuximab in combination with first-line chemotherapy demonstrates clinical outcomes and safety data similar to results from the other pivotal randomized controlled trials. Study Number: EMR062202-515 (https://www.pei.de/SharedDocs/awb/nis-0101-0200/0114.html) Registered on 04-MAY-2010.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-15753-5
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ERBITAG: Non-interventional study on the efficacy of cetuximab in first-line therapy in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer

Michael Schwittay, Karsten G. Stenzel, Thomas Goehler, Christiane Hering-Schubert et al.
BMC Cancer
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
article

ERBITAG: Non-interventional study on the efficacy of cetuximab in first-line therapy in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer

Michael Schwittay, Karsten G. Stenzel, Thomas Goehler, Christiane Hering-Schubert, Friedrich Overkamp, Oleg Rubanov, Ulf Neumann, Stephan Sahm, Mark-Oliver Zahn, Christoph Maintz, Jan Janssen, Julia Reinke
article en

Abstract

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a difficult-to-treat disease with poor clinical outcomes. Systemic chemotherapy in combination with targeted anti-EGFR therapy has expanded the treatment options for mCRC. However, the therapeutic efficacy of anti-EGFR regimens and relevant prognostic factors vary according to age, performance status and tumor location. The non-interventional ERBITAG study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab in first-line therapy in RAS WT mCRC patients under routine clinical practice. ERBITAG is a non-interventional study of wild-type (WT) RAS mCRC patients initiating a first-line therapy with cetuximab from 2010 to 2018. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Maier methods. χ²-test was used to compare selected categorial variables. Of a total of 728 patients included, baseline characteristics were: median 67 years, male sex 69%, ECOG performance status ≤ 1 81.3%, left-sided tumors 64.5%, liver metastasis 73.4% and prior hepatic metastasis resection before cetuximab-based treatment 16.4%. Median PFS was 10.9 months, median OS was 23.6 months and ORR was 58.0%. Resection rate of liver and/or lung metastases under cetuximab-based therapy was 13.9% and 18.9% of liver metastases. The most common treatment-emergent event (TEAE) was acne-like rash (all grades: 46.8%; grade 3–4: 4.7%). Subgroup analysis showed better outcomes in younger patients (ORR, OS), patients with left-sided tumors (ORR, PFS, OS) and lower grade tumors (ORR, PFS, OS), patients with resected liver and/or lung metastases (PFS, OS) and patients with treatment breaks (OS). Skin prophylaxis with systemic antibiotics and/or topical steroids (ORR, OS, PFS) was associated with better outcomes. The ERBITAG study provides insights into the use of cetuximab in a large RAS WT mCRC cohort in real-life clinical practice in Germany. Cetuximab in combination with first-line chemotherapy demonstrates clinical outcomes and safety data similar to results from the other pivotal randomized controlled trials. Study Number: EMR062202-515 (https://www.pei.de/SharedDocs/awb/nis-0101-0200/0114.html) Registered on 04-MAY-2010.

BMC CancerVol. 26(1)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Merck KGaA, Darmstadt (Germany) (DE), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Klinikum St. Georg (DE), Essen University Hospital (DE), Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie (DE), Malteser-Krankenhaus (DE), Onkozentrum Dresden (DE), Roth and Rau (Germany) (DE)
Merck KGaA
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.