Too much to trust: how conflicting and misleading health information shape patient trust and social media behavior

As social media becomes a major channel for health information, it reshapes provider–patient communication and creates new challenges for healthcare marketing. This study uses data from the U.S. Health Information National Trends Survey to examine how conflicting health information, misinformation, and patient-centered communication (PCC) affect trust in medical providers and influence social media behavior. Findings show an inverted U-shaped relationship between exposure to inaccurate information and trust: moderate exposure can reinforce trust, while high exposure sharply reduces it. Trust declines more quickly when conflicting messages come from official health authorities. PCC, in contrast, consistently strengthens trust and lowers patients’ reliance on social media for health information. For healthcare marketing, these results highlight that early trust-building, clear communication, and a credible digital presence are key to preventing misinformation-driven trust erosion and enhancing brand trust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marketing Analytics
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-026-00458-2
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Too much to trust: how conflicting and misleading health information shape patient trust and social media behavior

Jingbo Zhang, Lili Gai
Journal of Marketing Analytics
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Too much to trust: how conflicting and misleading health information shape patient trust and social media behavior

Jingbo Zhang, Lili Gai
article en

Abstract

As social media becomes a major channel for health information, it reshapes provider–patient communication and creates new challenges for healthcare marketing. This study uses data from the U.S. Health Information National Trends Survey to examine how conflicting health information, misinformation, and patient-centered communication (PCC) affect trust in medical providers and influence social media behavior. Findings show an inverted U-shaped relationship between exposure to inaccurate information and trust: moderate exposure can reinforce trust, while high exposure sharply reduces it. Trust declines more quickly when conflicting messages come from official health authorities. PCC, in contrast, consistently strengthens trust and lowers patients’ reliance on social media for health information. For healthcare marketing, these results highlight that early trust-building, clear communication, and a credible digital presence are key to preventing misinformation-driven trust erosion and enhancing brand trust.

Journal of Marketing Analytics
The University of Texas of the Permian Basin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.