Sociolinguistics meets typology: Insight from vernacular speech to account for cross-linguistic patterns

This study explores how two English grammatical systems with alternative grammatical options expose typological tendencies. A study of negation, no vs. negative quantifiers (nothing) vs. negative polarity items (any/anybody) reveals that the syntactic patterning of English indefinites and negative objects lines up with the hard syntax of the same expressions in closely related languages. A study of variable possession (the vs. my/our) reveals that while much of the system is stable, but nuances of contrast between UK and Canadian patterns expose differences in conceptions of the personal domain that relate to the cultures in which the varieties are spoken. Taken together these results make several important contributions: 1) the value of natural speech data in providing insights into linguistic and sociolinguistic typology operating in tandem; 2) the importance of statistical tools to uncover relevant patterns and contrasts in variable data. The findings affirm that patterns in single variety, when viewed across communities, dialects and languages reveal that linguistic systems are a continuum of interlocking structural and tractile contrasts in the broader context of human language.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2785-0943/19724
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sociolinguistics meets typology: Insight from vernacular speech to account for cross-linguistic patterns

Sali A. Tagliamonte
Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

Sociolinguistics meets typology: Insight from vernacular speech to account for cross-linguistic patterns

Sali A. Tagliamonte
article en

Abstract

This study explores how two English grammatical systems with alternative grammatical options expose typological tendencies. A study of negation, no vs. negative quantifiers (nothing) vs. negative polarity items (any/anybody) reveals that the syntactic patterning of English indefinites and negative objects lines up with the hard syntax of the same expressions in closely related languages. A study of variable possession (the vs. my/our) reveals that while much of the system is stable, but nuances of contrast between UK and Canadian patterns expose differences in conceptions of the personal domain that relate to the cultures in which the varieties are spoken. Taken together these results make several important contributions: 1) the value of natural speech data in providing insights into linguistic and sociolinguistic typology operating in tandem; 2) the importance of statistical tools to uncover relevant patterns and contrasts in variable data. The findings affirm that patterns in single variety, when viewed across communities, dialects and languages reveal that linguistic systems are a continuum of interlocking structural and tractile contrasts in the broader context of human language.

Linguistic Typology at the CrossroadsVol. 5(2)
University of Toronto (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Economic and Social Research Council
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.