Functionally rich crop rotations increase calorie and macronutrient outputs across Europe

Increased crop diversity in cereal-dominated rotations can enhance crop protection, nutrient use efficiency and climate change adaptation. Nevertheless, it is argued that replacing cereals in rotations diminishes food production, threatening food security. Here we compared outputs of calories and macronutrients (carbohydrates, proteins, fats) for human consumption from cereal monocultures, cereal-only rotations and rotations including two or three functionally distinct crop types (cereals plus root and oil crops, legumes or ley) in 16 long-term experiments across Europe. Rotations with three functional types produced more calories and macronutrients than cereal monocultures and cereal-only rotations with forage crops used to produce milk. Carbohydrate gains depended on growing conditions and crop choice. Advantages increased over time but were lost with forage crops used for beef or biofuel. Functionally rich rotations provided macronutrient proportions closer to recommended human diets. Our analysis shows no trade-off between functionally rich rotations and food production or agricultural land expansion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Food
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-026-01293-5
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Functionally rich crop rotations increase calorie and macronutrient outputs across Europe

Lorenzo Negri, Riccardo Bommarco, Christine Watson, Timothy M. Bowles et al.
Nature Food
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Functionally rich crop rotations increase calorie and macronutrient outputs across Europe

Lorenzo Negri, Riccardo Bommarco, Christine Watson, Timothy M. Bowles, K. Jończyk, Andrea Onofri, Martina Mazzon, K. Topp, Z. Sawińska, Francesco Tei, Boël Sandström, José Luis Tenorio Pasamón, Alessio Costa, Robin L. Walker, Claudio Marzadori, Monique E. Smith, Jarosław Stalenga, Giulia Vico, Amélie C. M. Gaudin, Andrzej Blecharczyk, Inés Santín-Montanyá, Guido Baldoni, Antonio Berti
article en

Abstract

Increased crop diversity in cereal-dominated rotations can enhance crop protection, nutrient use efficiency and climate change adaptation. Nevertheless, it is argued that replacing cereals in rotations diminishes food production, threatening food security. Here we compared outputs of calories and macronutrients (carbohydrates, proteins, fats) for human consumption from cereal monocultures, cereal-only rotations and rotations including two or three functionally distinct crop types (cereals plus root and oil crops, legumes or ley) in 16 long-term experiments across Europe. Rotations with three functional types produced more calories and macronutrients than cereal monocultures and cereal-only rotations with forage crops used to produce milk. Carbohydrate gains depended on growing conditions and crop choice. Advantages increased over time but were lost with forage crops used for beef or biofuel. Functionally rich rotations provided macronutrient proportions closer to recommended human diets. Our analysis shows no trade-off between functionally rich rotations and food production or agricultural land expansion.

Nature FoodVol. 7(2)
University of Padua (IT), Scotland's Rural College (GB), University of Perugia (IT), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation (PL), Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (ES), University of Life Sciences in Poznań (PL), University of California, Davis (US), University of Bologna (IT), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division, Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Vetenskapsrådet, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu, Università di Bologna, Directorate for Biological Sciences
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.