Hesitancy towards the COVID-19 booster vaccination: a thematic analysis from a focus group study in Spain

The aim of this study was to evaluate beliefs about and attitudes towards COVID-19 booster vaccination among subjects who had received the complete vaccination schedule but had not received the booster. We conducted a qualitative study using online focus groups made up of participants from all parts of Spain who had received the primary vaccination schedule but had subsequently refused any of the booster doses. Individuals were recruited by snowball sampling. The study used 5 focus groups having a total of 30 participants. The thematic analysis identified 10 themes and 32 subthemes. Gynaecological problems and long-term adverse effects were associated with booster hesitancy. Participants perceived the vaccine as less necessary, as they considered it incapable of halting transmission and believed that the risk was much lower than at the onset of the pandemic. Rapid development of the COVID vaccine as compared to that of traditional vaccines, coupled with continuous changes in information, generated distrust and contributed to booster vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy can appear at any time and with any vaccine despite its evident public health benefits, as is the case of COVID-19 booster doses. Policy-makers should therefore focus on generating trust and responsibility when it comes to booster vaccinations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-26674-0
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hesitancy towards the COVID-19 booster vaccination: a thematic analysis from a focus group study in Spain

F Roque, María Teresa Herdeiro, Adolfo Figueiras, Ana López-Durán et al.
BMC Public Health
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Hesitancy towards the COVID-19 booster vaccination: a thematic analysis from a focus group study in Spain

F Roque, María Teresa Herdeiro, Adolfo Figueiras, Ana López-Durán, A Prieto-Campo, M Zapata-Cachafeiro
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate beliefs about and attitudes towards COVID-19 booster vaccination among subjects who had received the complete vaccination schedule but had not received the booster. We conducted a qualitative study using online focus groups made up of participants from all parts of Spain who had received the primary vaccination schedule but had subsequently refused any of the booster doses. Individuals were recruited by snowball sampling. The study used 5 focus groups having a total of 30 participants. The thematic analysis identified 10 themes and 32 subthemes. Gynaecological problems and long-term adverse effects were associated with booster hesitancy. Participants perceived the vaccine as less necessary, as they considered it incapable of halting transmission and believed that the risk was much lower than at the onset of the pandemic. Rapid development of the COVID vaccine as compared to that of traditional vaccines, coupled with continuous changes in information, generated distrust and contributed to booster vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy can appear at any time and with any vaccine despite its evident public health benefits, as is the case of COVID-19 booster doses. Policy-makers should therefore focus on generating trust and responsibility when it comes to booster vaccinations.

BMC Public Health
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Universidade Politécnica da Guarda (PT), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (ES), University of Aveiro (PT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.