Towards greater social anchoring in language typology

In this paper we make the case for the further social anchoring of linguistic typology by illustrating recent methodological developments in the field of comparative research on language contact. We begin by discussing similarities and differences between sociolinguistics and language typology and focusing on the issue of the social anchoring of research on language variation and linguistic diversity. We argue that while sociolinguistics is socially anchored by definition, linguistic typology has so far abstracted languages from their social contexts due to the nature of macro-comparison and the poor availability of data on sociolinguistic environments. We suggest that greater social anchoring in large-scale comparative research on language structures is possible and can be achieved through integrating two general aspects of language use, relationality and context-dependency, into typological models of language variation and change. We illustrate how data collection on bilingual language ecologies embodies the notion of relationality and context-dependency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2785-0943/19626
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards greater social anchoring in language typology

Eri Kashima, Kaius Sinnemäki, Francesca Di Garbo
Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

Towards greater social anchoring in language typology

Eri Kashima, Kaius Sinnemäki, Francesca Di Garbo
article en

Abstract

In this paper we make the case for the further social anchoring of linguistic typology by illustrating recent methodological developments in the field of comparative research on language contact. We begin by discussing similarities and differences between sociolinguistics and language typology and focusing on the issue of the social anchoring of research on language variation and linguistic diversity. We argue that while sociolinguistics is socially anchored by definition, linguistic typology has so far abstracted languages from their social contexts due to the nature of macro-comparison and the poor availability of data on sociolinguistic environments. We suggest that greater social anchoring in large-scale comparative research on language structures is possible and can be achieved through integrating two general aspects of language use, relationality and context-dependency, into typological models of language variation and change. We illustrate how data collection on bilingual language ecologies embodies the notion of relationality and context-dependency.

Linguistic Typology at the CrossroadsVol. 5(2)
Australian National University (AU), University of Helsinki (FI), Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
European Commission
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.