For a Discourse-Sensitive Typology: Theoretical and methodological aspects

The aims of this paper are twofold. First, I aim to discuss some theoretical and practical issues concerning the methods employed by linguists when doing typological research. More specifically, I will present the kinds of data typologists usually base their work on, also discussing some related issues that deal with the nature of the data themselves and the possible misinterpretations that they may lead to. Then, I will discuss how typology tends to focus its attention over a limited array of phenomena (i.e., morphosyntactic ones), leaving aside phenomena pertaining to other levels of analysis (e.g., discourse). I thus will exemplify how integrating discourse phenomena might result in more comprehensive analyses and, consequently, in better-suited typological generalizations. Second, I will propose a multi-level method (which I call discourse-sensitive typology) based on the converging evidence perspective, discussing how it might help us to overcome the abovementioned issues and ultimately make typology truly usage-based.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2785-0943/21716
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

For a Discourse-Sensitive Typology: Theoretical and methodological aspects

Simone Mattiola
Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

For a Discourse-Sensitive Typology: Theoretical and methodological aspects

Simone Mattiola
article en

Abstract

The aims of this paper are twofold. First, I aim to discuss some theoretical and practical issues concerning the methods employed by linguists when doing typological research. More specifically, I will present the kinds of data typologists usually base their work on, also discussing some related issues that deal with the nature of the data themselves and the possible misinterpretations that they may lead to. Then, I will discuss how typology tends to focus its attention over a limited array of phenomena (i.e., morphosyntactic ones), leaving aside phenomena pertaining to other levels of analysis (e.g., discourse). I thus will exemplify how integrating discourse phenomena might result in more comprehensive analyses and, consequently, in better-suited typological generalizations. Second, I will propose a multi-level method (which I call discourse-sensitive typology) based on the converging evidence perspective, discussing how it might help us to overcome the abovementioned issues and ultimately make typology truly usage-based.

Linguistic Typology at the CrossroadsVol. 5(2)
University of Pavia (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.