Evaluating ICD-11 anorexia nervosa in a clinical youth sample: a comparison with ICD-10

Objective: The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) was recently updated to an 11th edition, introducing significant changes to the diagnostic criteria for Anorexia Nervosa (AN). Little is known about how these updated criteria impact diagnostic classification in previously diagnosed populations. This study aims to examine how a Danish youth sample previously diagnosed with ICD-10 AN or Atypical AN (atypAN) would classify under ICD-11 criteria, including the application of the new subtype specifier. Furthermore, it investigates how ICD-11 diagnoses and subtypes relate to ED symptom severity compared to ICD-10 diagnoses. Methods: a prior ICD-10 AN and atypAN sample (N = 895) was reclassified under ICD-11 criteria, categorising those not meeting AN criteria as OSFED. AN cases were subtyped into Restrictive (AN-R) or Binge-Purge (AN-BP). Multiple linear models examined associations between 1) ICD-10 diagnoses; 2) ICD-11 diagnoses; and 3) AN subtypes, and EDE scores, while controlling for age and sex. Results: ICD-11 reclassification led to all ICD-10 AN and 127 atypAN cases meeting AN criteria. Only ICD-11 diagnosis was significantly associated with ED symptom severity, with AN showing greater severity than OSFED. AN-BP exhibited greater severity than AN-R. Discussion: ICD-11 increased number of full-threshold diagnoses and may thus aid in providing adequate treatment, and findings supported the subtyping introduced in ICD-11. However, a substantial amount of prior atypAN cases were not captured in ICD-11 diagnostic criteria. All prior ICD-10 AN cases met ICD-11 AN criteria, while 127 of 411 prior atypAN cases were reclassified as AN, with the remainder categorized as OSFED. Only ICD-11 AN diagnosis, not ICD-10 diagnosis, was significantly associated with greater ED symptom severity. The AN-Binge-Purge subtype exhibited higher levels of ED symptoms than the AN-Restrictive subtype, supporting the subtyping system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-026-02972-1
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating ICD-11 anorexia nervosa in a clinical youth sample: a comparison with ICD-10

Mie Sedoc Jørgensen, Bilal Ashraf, Signe Holm Pedersen, Anne Bryde et al.
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Evaluating ICD-11 anorexia nervosa in a clinical youth sample: a comparison with ICD-10

Mie Sedoc Jørgensen, Bilal Ashraf, Signe Holm Pedersen, Anne Bryde, Mette Bentz, Luna Thule Viggers, Nadia Micali
article en

Abstract

Objective: The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) was recently updated to an 11th edition, introducing significant changes to the diagnostic criteria for Anorexia Nervosa (AN). Little is known about how these updated criteria impact diagnostic classification in previously diagnosed populations. This study aims to examine how a Danish youth sample previously diagnosed with ICD-10 AN or Atypical AN (atypAN) would classify under ICD-11 criteria, including the application of the new subtype specifier. Furthermore, it investigates how ICD-11 diagnoses and subtypes relate to ED symptom severity compared to ICD-10 diagnoses. Methods: a prior ICD-10 AN and atypAN sample (N = 895) was reclassified under ICD-11 criteria, categorising those not meeting AN criteria as OSFED. AN cases were subtyped into Restrictive (AN-R) or Binge-Purge (AN-BP). Multiple linear models examined associations between 1) ICD-10 diagnoses; 2) ICD-11 diagnoses; and 3) AN subtypes, and EDE scores, while controlling for age and sex. Results: ICD-11 reclassification led to all ICD-10 AN and 127 atypAN cases meeting AN criteria. Only ICD-11 diagnosis was significantly associated with ED symptom severity, with AN showing greater severity than OSFED. AN-BP exhibited greater severity than AN-R. Discussion: ICD-11 increased number of full-threshold diagnoses and may thus aid in providing adequate treatment, and findings supported the subtyping introduced in ICD-11. However, a substantial amount of prior atypAN cases were not captured in ICD-11 diagnostic criteria. All prior ICD-10 AN cases met ICD-11 AN criteria, while 127 of 411 prior atypAN cases were reclassified as AN, with the remainder categorized as OSFED. Only ICD-11 AN diagnosis, not ICD-10 diagnosis, was significantly associated with greater ED symptom severity. The AN-Binge-Purge subtype exhibited higher levels of ED symptoms than the AN-Restrictive subtype, supporting the subtyping system.

European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB), Mental Health Services (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), University College London (GB)
Region Hovedstaden
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.