An Investigation of the Relationship Between Hubris and Crab Syndrome in Athletes

The current study examined the relationship between hubris and crab syndrome in athletes and identifies the predictive role of hubris in crab syndrome. The study used a correlational research design. The research group consisted of 420 athletes from different sports, recruited through convenience sampling. Data were obtained through the Personal Information Form, the Arrogance (Hubris) Syndrome Scale developed by Tutar & Nacar and the Crab Syndrome Scale developed by Üzüm & Özdemir. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, correlation, and regression analyses. It was found that participants’ hubris levels were below average, their crab syndrome levels were average, and there was a positive correlation between hubris and crab syndrome. It was also determined that hubris predicted the development of crab syndrome. Analyses of independent variables revealed that athletes’ hubris levels differed significantly by education level and sport type. In contrast, no statistically significant differences were observed for gender, age, national athlete status, international ranking status, and year of sport. Athletes’ crab syndrome levels showed significant differences by sport type; however, no statistically significant differences were found across gender, age, education level, national athlete status, international ranking status, or sport year. The overall trend of the findings suggests that hubris and crab syndrome represent related psychological tendencies among athletes, indicating a conceptual connection between these constructs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spor Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25307/jssr.1810357
Primary Topic
History, Medicine, and Leadership
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Investigation of the Relationship Between Hubris and Crab Syndrome in Athletes

Ünsal Altınışık
Spor Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi
History, Medicine, and Leadership
article

An Investigation of the Relationship Between Hubris and Crab Syndrome in Athletes

Ünsal Altınışık
article en

Abstract

The current study examined the relationship between hubris and crab syndrome in athletes and identifies the predictive role of hubris in crab syndrome. The study used a correlational research design. The research group consisted of 420 athletes from different sports, recruited through convenience sampling. Data were obtained through the Personal Information Form, the Arrogance (Hubris) Syndrome Scale developed by Tutar & Nacar and the Crab Syndrome Scale developed by Üzüm & Özdemir. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, correlation, and regression analyses. It was found that participants’ hubris levels were below average, their crab syndrome levels were average, and there was a positive correlation between hubris and crab syndrome. It was also determined that hubris predicted the development of crab syndrome. Analyses of independent variables revealed that athletes’ hubris levels differed significantly by education level and sport type. In contrast, no statistically significant differences were observed for gender, age, national athlete status, international ranking status, and year of sport. Athletes’ crab syndrome levels showed significant differences by sport type; however, no statistically significant differences were found across gender, age, education level, national athlete status, international ranking status, or sport year. The overall trend of the findings suggests that hubris and crab syndrome represent related psychological tendencies among athletes, indicating a conceptual connection between these constructs.

Spor Bilimleri Araştırmaları DergisiVol. 11(1)
Adnan Menderes University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
History, Medicine, and Leadership
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.