Family Affluence and Lifestyle Behaviors as Determinants of Fat Mass Index in University Students: A Sex-Specific Structural Equation Modeling Approach

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Family affluence is commonly considered an important contextual determinant of adiposity; however, its relative contribution compared with current lifestyle behaviors during early adulthood remains unclear. This study examined direct associations between family affluence, specific lifestyle indicators (physical activity, sedentary time, and dietary indices), and fat mass index (FMI) in university students. <b>Methods</b>: This cross-sectional study included 418 students (199 males, 219 females). Family affluence (FAS), physical activity (PA), sedentary time (SITT), and dietary behaviors (positive and negative dietary indices) were assessed using standardized questionnaires. To evaluate how family affluence and behavioral variables relate to fat mass index (FMI), a structural equation modeling approach was implemented. Sex-specific models were estimated for males and females independently. <b>Results</b>: In both sexes, physical activity was inversely associated with fat mass index (FMI) and represented the strongest protective factor (males: β = -0.36, 95% CI: -0.46 to -0.26; females: β = -0.35, 95% CI: -0.45 to -0.25; both <i>p</i> < 0.001). The negative dietary index showed a significant positive association with FMI in males (β = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.48; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and females (β = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.42; <i>p</i> = 0.001). Sedentary time was positively associated with FMI only in females (β = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.28; <i>p</i> = 0.022). No statistically significant direct effect of family affluence on FMI was observed in either males or females. The SEM models explained 30% of FMI variance in males and 37% in females. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this cross-sectional university sample, proximal lifestyle indicators showed stronger direct associations with FMI than family affluence. These findings suggest that interventions targeting physical activity and unhealthy dietary behaviors may be particularly relevant for adiposity prevention in early adulthood, although longitudinal research is required to clarify causal pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18050730
Primary Topic
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Family Affluence and Lifestyle Behaviors as Determinants of Fat Mass Index in University Students: A Sex-Specific Structural Equation Modeling Approach

Jarosław Domaradzki
Nutrients
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
article

Family Affluence and Lifestyle Behaviors as Determinants of Fat Mass Index in University Students: A Sex-Specific Structural Equation Modeling Approach

Jarosław Domaradzki
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Family affluence is commonly considered an important contextual determinant of adiposity; however, its relative contribution compared with current lifestyle behaviors during early adulthood remains unclear. This study examined direct associations between family affluence, specific lifestyle indicators (physical activity, sedentary time, and dietary indices), and fat mass index (FMI) in university students. <b>Methods</b>: This cross-sectional study included 418 students (199 males, 219 females). Family affluence (FAS), physical activity (PA), sedentary time (SITT), and dietary behaviors (positive and negative dietary indices) were assessed using standardized questionnaires. To evaluate how family affluence and behavioral variables relate to fat mass index (FMI), a structural equation modeling approach was implemented. Sex-specific models were estimated for males and females independently. <b>Results</b>: In both sexes, physical activity was inversely associated with fat mass index (FMI) and represented the strongest protective factor (males: β = -0.36, 95% CI: -0.46 to -0.26; females: β = -0.35, 95% CI: -0.45 to -0.25; both <i>p</i> < 0.001). The negative dietary index showed a significant positive association with FMI in males (β = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.48; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and females (β = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.42; <i>p</i> = 0.001). Sedentary time was positively associated with FMI only in females (β = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.28; <i>p</i> = 0.022). No statistically significant direct effect of family affluence on FMI was observed in either males or females. The SEM models explained 30% of FMI variance in males and 37% in females. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this cross-sectional university sample, proximal lifestyle indicators showed stronger direct associations with FMI than family affluence. These findings suggest that interventions targeting physical activity and unhealthy dietary behaviors may be particularly relevant for adiposity prevention in early adulthood, although longitudinal research is required to clarify causal pathways.

NutrientsVol. 18(5)
Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.