Social network analysis for territorial sustainability governance: a systematic review

This article critically examines the role of Social Network Analysis (SNA) in stakeholder mapping for territorial sustainability. Based on a systematic literature review of 14 highly relevant peer-reviewed articles (2018–2025) focused on critical application, the study interrogates the epistemological and normative assumptions embedded in common SNA applications. While SNA is often used to identify actor centrality and coordination, this review explores its potential to reveal power asymmetries, inclusion gaps, and governance legitimacy. Emergent thematic domains include stakeholder diversity, institutional performance, and reflexive approach to SNA, reframing it as both technical instrument and critical lens for democratic governance. This contribution aligns with deliberative models of public administration and aims to advance theoretical dialogue on collaborative networks, territorial resilience, and ethical governance in the sustainability context. Systematic review registration https://www.osf.io/d6qfy/overview .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sustainable Cities
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2026.1733546
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social network analysis for territorial sustainability governance: a systematic review

Lorena Jaramillo-Mediavilla, Julio Andrade-Palacios, Karina Jaramillo-Mediavilla
Frontiers in Sustainable Cities
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Social network analysis for territorial sustainability governance: a systematic review

Lorena Jaramillo-Mediavilla, Julio Andrade-Palacios, Karina Jaramillo-Mediavilla
article en

Abstract

This article critically examines the role of Social Network Analysis (SNA) in stakeholder mapping for territorial sustainability. Based on a systematic literature review of 14 highly relevant peer-reviewed articles (2018–2025) focused on critical application, the study interrogates the epistemological and normative assumptions embedded in common SNA applications. While SNA is often used to identify actor centrality and coordination, this review explores its potential to reveal power asymmetries, inclusion gaps, and governance legitimacy. Emergent thematic domains include stakeholder diversity, institutional performance, and reflexive approach to SNA, reframing it as both technical instrument and critical lens for democratic governance. This contribution aligns with deliberative models of public administration and aims to advance theoretical dialogue on collaborative networks, territorial resilience, and ethical governance in the sustainability context. Systematic review registration https://www.osf.io/d6qfy/overview .

Frontiers in Sustainable CitiesVol. 8
Universidad Técnica del Norte (EC)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.