Spatial and social inequities in access to essential healthcare services: a case study of a fast-growing, diverse Canadian city

Access to healthcare services remains a persistent challenge, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations. Limited access results in lower service utilisation and worse health outcomes, hindering progress toward inclusive and sustainable cities. This study developed a novel methodological framework integrating high-resolution (1-km<sup>2</sup>) socio-demographic data from the 2021 Canadian Census with an advanced multimodal transport routing engine (R<sup>5</sup>) to assess healthcare access via public transit in Surrey, British Columbia - a fast-growing, diverse city. Using a 30-min travel time threshold, we computed destination-oriented ('passive') and origin-oriented ('active') accessibility to walk-in clinics, urgent care centres, and hospitals. Eco-intersectional multilevel modelling was applied to examine accessibility inequalities across intersectional strata, defined as areas with a high concentration of vulnerable populations based on age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, and urbanicity (>vs. ≤ 400 people/km<sup>2</sup>). Overall, 319,402 (56.2%) residents could reach at least one healthcare facility within 30 min via public transit. Walk-in clinics were the most accessible, followed by urgent care centres and hospitals. Many vulnerable populations were concentrated near major urban centres, which generally had access to more facilities than the city's periphery and outer suburbs. Strata with a high concentration of females had higher odds of accessibility, while seniors and non-urban areas had lower odds. Access inequalities were most pronounced among senior visible minority communities living in non-urban areas. Equity-oriented planning and investments in sustainable transportation and healthcare infrastructure are required to close accessibility gaps. This scalable, open-data framework can inform inclusive urban policy and improve access to essential services for underserved communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health & Place
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2026.103640
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial and social inequities in access to essential healthcare services: a case study of a fast-growing, diverse Canadian city

Christina Draeger, Ben Mumford, Martino Tran, Amrit Tiwana
Health & Place
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Spatial and social inequities in access to essential healthcare services: a case study of a fast-growing, diverse Canadian city

Christina Draeger, Ben Mumford, Martino Tran, Amrit Tiwana
article en

Abstract

Access to healthcare services remains a persistent challenge, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations. Limited access results in lower service utilisation and worse health outcomes, hindering progress toward inclusive and sustainable cities. This study developed a novel methodological framework integrating high-resolution (1-km<sup>2</sup>) socio-demographic data from the 2021 Canadian Census with an advanced multimodal transport routing engine (R<sup>5</sup>) to assess healthcare access via public transit in Surrey, British Columbia - a fast-growing, diverse city. Using a 30-min travel time threshold, we computed destination-oriented ('passive') and origin-oriented ('active') accessibility to walk-in clinics, urgent care centres, and hospitals. Eco-intersectional multilevel modelling was applied to examine accessibility inequalities across intersectional strata, defined as areas with a high concentration of vulnerable populations based on age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, and urbanicity (>vs. ≤ 400 people/km<sup>2</sup>). Overall, 319,402 (56.2%) residents could reach at least one healthcare facility within 30 min via public transit. Walk-in clinics were the most accessible, followed by urgent care centres and hospitals. Many vulnerable populations were concentrated near major urban centres, which generally had access to more facilities than the city's periphery and outer suburbs. Strata with a high concentration of females had higher odds of accessibility, while seniors and non-urban areas had lower odds. Access inequalities were most pronounced among senior visible minority communities living in non-urban areas. Equity-oriented planning and investments in sustainable transportation and healthcare infrastructure are required to close accessibility gaps. This scalable, open-data framework can inform inclusive urban policy and improve access to essential services for underserved communities.

Health & PlaceVol. 98
University of British Columbia (CA), BC Centre for Disease Control (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.