At the crossroads of typology and language(s) in use

A long-standing issue in linguistic typology concerns the relationship between cross-linguistic generalization and the empirical foundations on which such generalizations are built. The contributions assembled in this issue of Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads approach this question from complementary empirical and theoretical perspectives. On the one hand, several papers pursue typological analysis that is explicitly anchored in naturally occurring data, examining how cross-linguistic generalizations are affected when categories and comparisons are grounded in attested usage. On the other hand, the issue includes studies of intralinguistic variation—sometimes drawing on variationist sociolinguistic frameworks—that take variation itself as an empirical window onto grammatical organization; patterns of variation are used to formulate and test generalizations that bear on typological comparison and explanatory modeling. Together, these perspectives invite reflection on how typological generalizations are constructed, evaluated, and interpreted when both cross-linguistic and intralinguistic evidence are incorporated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2785-0943/24199
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

At the crossroads of typology and language(s) in use

Caterina Mauri, Silvia Ballarè, Simone Mattiola
Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

At the crossroads of typology and language(s) in use

Caterina Mauri, Silvia Ballarè, Simone Mattiola
article en

Abstract

A long-standing issue in linguistic typology concerns the relationship between cross-linguistic generalization and the empirical foundations on which such generalizations are built. The contributions assembled in this issue of Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads approach this question from complementary empirical and theoretical perspectives. On the one hand, several papers pursue typological analysis that is explicitly anchored in naturally occurring data, examining how cross-linguistic generalizations are affected when categories and comparisons are grounded in attested usage. On the other hand, the issue includes studies of intralinguistic variation—sometimes drawing on variationist sociolinguistic frameworks—that take variation itself as an empirical window onto grammatical organization; patterns of variation are used to formulate and test generalizations that bear on typological comparison and explanatory modeling. Together, these perspectives invite reflection on how typological generalizations are constructed, evaluated, and interpreted when both cross-linguistic and intralinguistic evidence are incorporated.

Linguistic Typology at the CrossroadsVol. 5(2)
University of Pavia (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.