Delivering Attraction? How BRI Implementation Shapes China’s Soft Power in Bangladesh and Pakistan

China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) can generate soft power, but its reputational payoffs are conditional, not automatic. I argue that BRI projects produce ‘developmental soft power’ primarily when three conditions hold: credible delivery, fiscally prudent financing and local narrative co-ownership by domestic elites and media. A qualitative comparative analysis of Bangladesh and Pakistan shows divergent pathways. In Pakistan, where strategic ties and elite consensus long predate the BRI, China–Pakistan Economic Corridor amplifies an already durable pro-China orientation and buffers backlash. In Bangladesh, visible infrastructure gains improve China’s image, but debt concerns and India-linked counter-narratives constrain reputational returns. These findings extend Nye’s attraction framework by specifying development performance as a distinct mechanism of soft power and by identifying the political and narrative conditions under which infrastructure translates into legitimacy abroad.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
China Report
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00094455261424404
Primary Topic
Belt and Road Initiative
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Delivering Attraction? How BRI Implementation Shapes China’s Soft Power in Bangladesh and Pakistan

Md. Obaidullah
China Report
Belt and Road Initiative
article

Delivering Attraction? How BRI Implementation Shapes China’s Soft Power in Bangladesh and Pakistan

Md. Obaidullah
article en

Abstract

China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) can generate soft power, but its reputational payoffs are conditional, not automatic. I argue that BRI projects produce ‘developmental soft power’ primarily when three conditions hold: credible delivery, fiscally prudent financing and local narrative co-ownership by domestic elites and media. A qualitative comparative analysis of Bangladesh and Pakistan shows divergent pathways. In Pakistan, where strategic ties and elite consensus long predate the BRI, China–Pakistan Economic Corridor amplifies an already durable pro-China orientation and buffers backlash. In Bangladesh, visible infrastructure gains improve China’s image, but debt concerns and India-linked counter-narratives constrain reputational returns. These findings extend Nye’s attraction framework by specifying development performance as a distinct mechanism of soft power and by identifying the political and narrative conditions under which infrastructure translates into legitimacy abroad.

China Report
Daffodil International University (BD), University of Southern Mississippi (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Belt and Road Initiative
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.