The interrelationship of TMJ morphology, craniofacial structure, and airway dimensions in patients with disc displacement

This study aimed to comprehensively analyse the interrelationships between temporomandibular joint (TMJ) morphology, craniofacial skeletal patterns, and oropharyngeal airway dimensions in patients with TMJ disc displacement (TMJ DD). Based on the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) and subsequent MRI confirmation, this retrospective study included 91 adult patients with TMD DD. These patients were then categorized into three groups.: Bilateral Normal disc position (BN, n = 36), Disc Displacement with Reduction (DDR, n = 25), and Disc Displacement without Reduction (DDWR, n = 30). All participants underwent cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and cephalometric analysis of craniofacial structure and three-dimensional assessment of TMJ morphology (including joint spaces, fossa dimensions, and condylar inclination) and oropharyngeal airway volume (OPV) and area (OPA). Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA/Kruskal–Wallis tests for group comparisons, Spearman's correlation to assess bivariate relationships, and multiple linear regression (MLR) to identify independent predictors of airway dimensions while controlling for confounders. Significant differences were observed in craniofacial, TMJ characteristics, and oropharyngeal airway dimensions among the groups. The DDWR group exhibited a retrognathic and hyperdivergent skeletal pattern (larger ANB, smaller SNB, higher FMA; p < 0.05). The DDR group demonstrated a significantly steeper anterior condylar inclination and a more posteriorly positioned condyle. Crucially, oropharyngeal dimensions were significantly smaller in the DDR group compared to the BN group (OPV: 7688.56 ± 1770.14 mm3 vs. 10,562.47 ± 4185.89 mm3, p = 0.029; OPA: 410.76 ± 77.65 mm2 vs. 513.44 ± 145.21 mm2, p = 0.018). Correlation and MLR analyses revealed that a constricted airway was associated with mandibular retrognathism, specific TMJ features, and reduced vertical facial dimensions. Notably, glenoid fossa height was a significant positive predictor for both OPV and OPA. TMJ DD is associated with specific craniofacial patterns and reduced oropharyngeal airway dimensions. These findings underscore a significant association within the TMJ-craniofacial-airway complex, advocating for an integrated clinical approach in diagnosing and treating temporomandibular disorders and airway compromise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-07861-2
Primary Topic
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The interrelationship of TMJ morphology, craniofacial structure, and airway dimensions in patients with disc displacement

Mazen Musa, Hu Zhang, Almustafa Osama, Mahmoud Nasih et al.
BMC Oral Health
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
article

The interrelationship of TMJ morphology, craniofacial structure, and airway dimensions in patients with disc displacement

Mazen Musa, Hu Zhang, Almustafa Osama, Mahmoud Nasih, Cheng Dong Zheng, Yu Han Ren, Shuang Wang
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to comprehensively analyse the interrelationships between temporomandibular joint (TMJ) morphology, craniofacial skeletal patterns, and oropharyngeal airway dimensions in patients with TMJ disc displacement (TMJ DD). Based on the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) and subsequent MRI confirmation, this retrospective study included 91 adult patients with TMD DD. These patients were then categorized into three groups.: Bilateral Normal disc position (BN, n = 36), Disc Displacement with Reduction (DDR, n = 25), and Disc Displacement without Reduction (DDWR, n = 30). All participants underwent cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and cephalometric analysis of craniofacial structure and three-dimensional assessment of TMJ morphology (including joint spaces, fossa dimensions, and condylar inclination) and oropharyngeal airway volume (OPV) and area (OPA). Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA/Kruskal–Wallis tests for group comparisons, Spearman's correlation to assess bivariate relationships, and multiple linear regression (MLR) to identify independent predictors of airway dimensions while controlling for confounders. Significant differences were observed in craniofacial, TMJ characteristics, and oropharyngeal airway dimensions among the groups. The DDWR group exhibited a retrognathic and hyperdivergent skeletal pattern (larger ANB, smaller SNB, higher FMA; p < 0.05). The DDR group demonstrated a significantly steeper anterior condylar inclination and a more posteriorly positioned condyle. Crucially, oropharyngeal dimensions were significantly smaller in the DDR group compared to the BN group (OPV: 7688.56 ± 1770.14 mm3 vs. 10,562.47 ± 4185.89 mm3, p = 0.029; OPA: 410.76 ± 77.65 mm2 vs. 513.44 ± 145.21 mm2, p = 0.018). Correlation and MLR analyses revealed that a constricted airway was associated with mandibular retrognathism, specific TMJ features, and reduced vertical facial dimensions. Notably, glenoid fossa height was a significant positive predictor for both OPV and OPA. TMJ DD is associated with specific craniofacial patterns and reduced oropharyngeal airway dimensions. These findings underscore a significant association within the TMJ-craniofacial-airway complex, advocating for an integrated clinical approach in diagnosing and treating temporomandibular disorders and airway compromise.

BMC Oral Health
University of Science and Technology Omdurman (SD), Sudan International University (SD), First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN), Stomatology Hospital (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.