Layered or simple: Making impact chains more accessible and useful to stakeholders

Multi-hazard disasters underline the need to shift from siloed Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRR/M) policies and practice to coordinated, multi-hazard strategies and increased stakeholder engagement. The challenge lies in designing models and tools that accurately convey the intricacies of multi-hazards, compounded impacts, vulnerabilities, and mitigation actions without overwhelming users, thus preserving the clarity needed for effective decision-making. Addressing this critical implementation gap, this study introduces Layered Impact Chains and Simplified Impact Chains as frameworks designed to streamline stakeholders’ understanding of Impact Chains. Layered Impact Chains break down the complete model into layers comprising elements and connections relevant for various stakeholder categories, while Simplified Impact Chains distil these layers to their essential components using a custom statistical metric. The proposed frameworks are applied in a case study featuring a multi-hazard event relevant for Bucharest, Romania, wherein a major earthquake would set off a cascade of secondary hazards, including a dam-break flood, fires, and liquefaction. The foundational complete multi-hazard Impact Chain was built collaboratively, integrating insights from a wide group of DRR/M stakeholders via one-on-one interviews, focus groups, and hybrid workshops. The proposed Layered and Simplified types were subsequently validated in terms of understandability, navigability, and usability through dedicated workshops and focus groups with the target stakeholders. By translating complex disaster analysis models into accessible formats, the proposed frameworks empower stakeholders to understand multi-hazard disasters and craft integrated and more effective DRR/M solutions. • Layered Impact Chains facilitate stakeholders’ understanding of complex models. • Simplified Impact Chains reduce stakeholder-dedicated layers to their essence. • Both frameworks are co-developed and validated by DRR and DRM stakeholders. • These proposed frameworks promote stakeholder engagement in creating DRM tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2026.106080
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Layered or simple: Making impact chains more accessible and useful to stakeholders

Andra-Cosmina Albulescu, Iuliana Armaş
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Layered or simple: Making impact chains more accessible and useful to stakeholders

Andra-Cosmina Albulescu, Iuliana Armaş
article en

Abstract

Multi-hazard disasters underline the need to shift from siloed Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRR/M) policies and practice to coordinated, multi-hazard strategies and increased stakeholder engagement. The challenge lies in designing models and tools that accurately convey the intricacies of multi-hazards, compounded impacts, vulnerabilities, and mitigation actions without overwhelming users, thus preserving the clarity needed for effective decision-making. Addressing this critical implementation gap, this study introduces Layered Impact Chains and Simplified Impact Chains as frameworks designed to streamline stakeholders’ understanding of Impact Chains. Layered Impact Chains break down the complete model into layers comprising elements and connections relevant for various stakeholder categories, while Simplified Impact Chains distil these layers to their essential components using a custom statistical metric. The proposed frameworks are applied in a case study featuring a multi-hazard event relevant for Bucharest, Romania, wherein a major earthquake would set off a cascade of secondary hazards, including a dam-break flood, fires, and liquefaction. The foundational complete multi-hazard Impact Chain was built collaboratively, integrating insights from a wide group of DRR/M stakeholders via one-on-one interviews, focus groups, and hybrid workshops. The proposed Layered and Simplified types were subsequently validated in terms of understandability, navigability, and usability through dedicated workshops and focus groups with the target stakeholders. By translating complex disaster analysis models into accessible formats, the proposed frameworks empower stakeholders to understand multi-hazard disasters and craft integrated and more effective DRR/M solutions. • Layered Impact Chains facilitate stakeholders’ understanding of complex models. • Simplified Impact Chains reduce stakeholder-dedicated layers to their essence. • Both frameworks are co-developed and validated by DRR and DRM stakeholders. • These proposed frameworks promote stakeholder engagement in creating DRM tools.

International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol. 136
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University (RO), University of Bucharest (RO)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.