JURISDICTION AND PROPER PARTIES IN NIGERIAN CIVIL LITIGATION: A REVIEW OF THE ADMIN. & EXEC. OF THE ESTATE OF ABACHA V EKE-SPIFF & ORS (2009) LPELR-3152 (SC)

The judicial decision of the Supreme Court in the case of the Administrators/Executors of the Estate of Abacha v Eke-Spiff & Ors is a locus clasicus in Nigerian civil procedure.In this case, the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the trial Court while simultaneously striking out the appeal on the ground of jurisdiction.A major issue with this decision is the affirmation of the trial court judgment despite the appeal being struck out and the absence of any cross appeal by the respondent.This article aims to appraise the position of the Supreme Court in this case and examine whether it can stand the test of time against other decisions of the apex court.The doctrinal research method was adopted for this analysis.The article recommends, among other things, that the Supreme Court should reconsider its stance on affirming the judgment of the trial court when the appeal is struck out for want of jurisdiction.It also recommends that the heirs of the late General Sani Abacha should approach the trial High Court of Rivers State and institute an action for the declaration of title to land.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UDUS Law Journal
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61955/arsbgb
Primary Topic
Legal Issues in South Africa
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

JURISDICTION AND PROPER PARTIES IN NIGERIAN CIVIL LITIGATION: A REVIEW OF THE ADMIN. & EXEC. OF THE ESTATE OF ABACHA V EKE-SPIFF & ORS (2009) LPELR-3152 (SC)

DANYARO DANYARO
UDUS Law Journal
Legal Issues in South Africa
article

JURISDICTION AND PROPER PARTIES IN NIGERIAN CIVIL LITIGATION: A REVIEW OF THE ADMIN. & EXEC. OF THE ESTATE OF ABACHA V EKE-SPIFF & ORS (2009) LPELR-3152 (SC)

DANYARO DANYARO
article en

Abstract

The judicial decision of the Supreme Court in the case of the Administrators/Executors of the Estate of Abacha v Eke-Spiff & Ors is a locus clasicus in Nigerian civil procedure.In this case, the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the trial Court while simultaneously striking out the appeal on the ground of jurisdiction.A major issue with this decision is the affirmation of the trial court judgment despite the appeal being struck out and the absence of any cross appeal by the respondent.This article aims to appraise the position of the Supreme Court in this case and examine whether it can stand the test of time against other decisions of the apex court.The doctrinal research method was adopted for this analysis.The article recommends, among other things, that the Supreme Court should reconsider its stance on affirming the judgment of the trial court when the appeal is struck out for want of jurisdiction.It also recommends that the heirs of the late General Sani Abacha should approach the trial High Court of Rivers State and institute an action for the declaration of title to land.

UDUS Law Journal
Usmanu Danfodiyo University (NG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Legal Issues in South Africa
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.