Coordinating digital transformation in healthcare : Governance, platforms, and generative interdependencies

Digital transformation of healthcare has largely been conceptualised throughadoption-centric lenses, relying on “barriers and facilitators” frameworks thatfocus primarily on individual technology adoption or organisational factors.Yet transformation in practice depends on sustained coordination amongmultiple autonomous actors who must align their actions across organisational,professional, and technological boundaries. This thesis examines healthcare’sdigital transformation through a coordination lens, conceptualising it as amultistakeholder collective action grounded in voluntary contributions andongoing cross-boundary work.The thesis addresses three research questions: how collective action iscoordinated and sustained (1) through governance arrangements indecentralised healthcare ecosystems, (2) through digital platforms in timecriticalsettings, and (3) how recurring challenges identified across thesesettings can be explained. The dissertation is presented as a compilation thesiscomprising four interrelated papers: an empirical study of governancearrangements in Sweden, an in-depth study of a health emergency responseplatform, and two systematic literature reviews that theorise coordination andstandardisation work in digital health ecosystems.Across the papers, the findings show that coordination failures persist notprimarily because actors lack shared goals, but because digital initiativescontinuously generate interdependencies that outpace the ecosystem’s capacityto align governance, standards, and everyday practice. At the governance level,coordination is weakened by opaque governance, limited feedbackmechanisms, and an over-reliance on regulation as a stabilising response toemerging cross-boundary dependencies. At the practice level, digital platformscoordinate emergency response through soft algorithmic coordination, whilealso shifting substantial responsibility for preparedness and continuity ontovolunteers, with implications for accountability and support.Synthesising these findings, the thesis explains recurring coordinationchallenges as outcomes of generative interdependencies in digital healthtransformation and outlines implications for building adaptive governancecapacity as interdependencies evolve.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Published
2026-02-16
Primary Topic
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coordinating digital transformation in healthcare : Governance, platforms, and generative interdependencies

Betty Nekesa Saenyi
Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
article

Coordinating digital transformation in healthcare : Governance, platforms, and generative interdependencies

Betty Nekesa Saenyi
article en

Abstract

Digital transformation of healthcare has largely been conceptualised throughadoption-centric lenses, relying on “barriers and facilitators” frameworks thatfocus primarily on individual technology adoption or organisational factors.Yet transformation in practice depends on sustained coordination amongmultiple autonomous actors who must align their actions across organisational,professional, and technological boundaries. This thesis examines healthcare’sdigital transformation through a coordination lens, conceptualising it as amultistakeholder collective action grounded in voluntary contributions andongoing cross-boundary work.The thesis addresses three research questions: how collective action iscoordinated and sustained (1) through governance arrangements indecentralised healthcare ecosystems, (2) through digital platforms in timecriticalsettings, and (3) how recurring challenges identified across thesesettings can be explained. The dissertation is presented as a compilation thesiscomprising four interrelated papers: an empirical study of governancearrangements in Sweden, an in-depth study of a health emergency responseplatform, and two systematic literature reviews that theorise coordination andstandardisation work in digital health ecosystems.Across the papers, the findings show that coordination failures persist notprimarily because actors lack shared goals, but because digital initiativescontinuously generate interdependencies that outpace the ecosystem’s capacityto align governance, standards, and everyday practice. At the governance level,coordination is weakened by opaque governance, limited feedbackmechanisms, and an over-reliance on regulation as a stabilising response toemerging cross-boundary dependencies. At the practice level, digital platformscoordinate emergency response through soft algorithmic coordination, whilealso shifting substantial responsibility for preparedness and continuity ontovolunteers, with implications for accountability and support.Synthesising these findings, the thesis explains recurring coordinationchallenges as outcomes of generative interdependencies in digital healthtransformation and outlines implications for building adaptive governancecapacity as interdependencies evolve.

Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.