a cross-sectional study in a rural community in central Mozambique

Background: Malaria remains a public health threat globally, mainly in African countries. Despite the progress made over the years, its control and elimination by 2030 appear to be a challenge. The community perspective on factors contributing to malaria burden is essential to develop preventive measures adapted to local contexts. Understanding the transmission rates, symptoms, prevention and treatment of malaria are essential for a population to effectively control the disease. This study assessed the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of Tambai residents to identify the possible gaps related to high malaria burden in a study implementation area. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study design with a qualitative approach held in Sofala province, Nhamatanda district, Tambai community. This KAP study was carried out before the intervention in May 2021 and after in June 2022. All heads of households from the study implementation area were surveyed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Data were processed in Microsoft excel, exported and analysed in Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 29.0. Results: The knowledge of the heads of households on symptoms, mode of transmission, prevention and treatment of malaria was high before and after the intervention (149; 96.8%) and (143; 91.1%), respectively. Heads of households show no differences on KAP regarding symptoms, mode of transmission, prevention and treatment of malaria when intervention and control or before and after intervention were compared. Conclusion: Both intervention and control groups showed high KAP before and after intervention, suggesting that the implementation of the REPELMALARIA project did not have an either positive nor negative impact on KAP scores. These findings suggests that the higher malaria cases in the study area are not related to the malaria knowledge, attitude and practice of householders. Trial registration: This results are from the main clinical trial registed in ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04419766.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Published
2025-12-01
Primary Topic
Malaria Research and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

a cross-sectional study in a rural community in central Mozambique

Ana Paula Abílio, Alberto Muanido, Henrique Silveira, João Luís Manuel et al.
Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Malaria Research and Control
article

a cross-sectional study in a rural community in central Mozambique

Ana Paula Abílio, Alberto Muanido, Henrique Silveira, João Luís Manuel, Nicole Azevedo, Falume Chale, Luzia Gonçalves, Joaquim Domingos Lequechane
article en

Abstract

Background: Malaria remains a public health threat globally, mainly in African countries. Despite the progress made over the years, its control and elimination by 2030 appear to be a challenge. The community perspective on factors contributing to malaria burden is essential to develop preventive measures adapted to local contexts. Understanding the transmission rates, symptoms, prevention and treatment of malaria are essential for a population to effectively control the disease. This study assessed the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of Tambai residents to identify the possible gaps related to high malaria burden in a study implementation area. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study design with a qualitative approach held in Sofala province, Nhamatanda district, Tambai community. This KAP study was carried out before the intervention in May 2021 and after in June 2022. All heads of households from the study implementation area were surveyed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Data were processed in Microsoft excel, exported and analysed in Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 29.0. Results: The knowledge of the heads of households on symptoms, mode of transmission, prevention and treatment of malaria was high before and after the intervention (149; 96.8%) and (143; 91.1%), respectively. Heads of households show no differences on KAP regarding symptoms, mode of transmission, prevention and treatment of malaria when intervention and control or before and after intervention were compared. Conclusion: Both intervention and control groups showed high KAP before and after intervention, suggesting that the implementation of the REPELMALARIA project did not have an either positive nor negative impact on KAP scores. These findings suggests that the higher malaria cases in the study area are not related to the malaria knowledge, attitude and practice of householders. Trial registration: This results are from the main clinical trial registed in ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04419766.

Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Malaria Research and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.