Assessing the climate sensitivity of wind power resources: Multi scenario-based analysis via bias-corrected CMIP6 scenarios

Wind energy is a key pillar of low-carbon transitions, yet wind power density (WPD) is highly sensitive to climate-driven changes in near-surface winds and their seasonality. This study presents projected relative changes (%) in WPD over Türkiye for the period 2025–2100 under SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5. After evaluating multiple bias-correction methods against observations, Empirical Quantile Mapping (EQM) was selected as the best-performing approach; therefore, all subsequent analyses use EQM-corrected data. Similarly, although nine CMIP6 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6) global climate models were initially assessed for each SSP, ACCESS-CM2 showed the highest agreement with observations and was thus used for all projections. Monthly and annual WPD changes reveal a pronounced seasonal asymmetry. During winter and late autumn (November–February), relative changes indicate enhanced wind potential in northern and northwestern Türkiye, while southern coastal regions tend to experience reductions, forming a recurring north–south dipole. January emerges as the most scenario-sensitive month: under SSP1-2.6 and SSP2-4.5, northern increases coexist with southern decreases, whereas SSP5-8.5 amplifies spatial contrasts rather than producing uniform change. February generally preserves this north-favored pattern, albeit with weaker contrasts. The warm season exhibits the clearest degradation in wind resources. April marks a transition month with widespread negative changes across much of the country. From May through August, persistently negative anomalies dominate large areas under all SSPs, indicating a systematic weakening of late-spring and summer wind potential. September shows limited and spatially heterogeneous recovery, while October and November display a pronounced rebound with widespread positive anomalies, particularly in northern regions, consistent with a return to stronger autumn circulation. Annual changes are comparatively muted, reflecting substantial compensation between cold-season gains and warm-season losses. Overall, the results demonstrate that climate change affects wind energy potential in Türkiye primarily through seasonal redistribution and increased intra-annual variability, highlighting the importance of scenario-based, month-resolved assessments rather than reliance on annual mean indicators alone. • A dual focus on the Marmara and Aegean coasts—regions with high but understudied wind energy potential. • Monthly-resolution wind power density projections to support operational optimization and seasonal planning. • Identification of Empirical Quantile Mapping (EQM) as the most accurate downscaling approach for future wind projections. • Integration of climate modeling, statistical bias correction, and energy policy implications within a unified framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Strategy Reviews
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2026.102151
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the climate sensitivity of wind power resources: Multi scenario-based analysis via bias-corrected CMIP6 scenarios

Erkan Karakoyun, Fatih Bayrak, Veysi Kartal, Miklas Scholz
Energy Strategy Reviews
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
article

Assessing the climate sensitivity of wind power resources: Multi scenario-based analysis via bias-corrected CMIP6 scenarios

Erkan Karakoyun, Fatih Bayrak, Veysi Kartal, Miklas Scholz
article en

Abstract

Wind energy is a key pillar of low-carbon transitions, yet wind power density (WPD) is highly sensitive to climate-driven changes in near-surface winds and their seasonality. This study presents projected relative changes (%) in WPD over Türkiye for the period 2025–2100 under SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5. After evaluating multiple bias-correction methods against observations, Empirical Quantile Mapping (EQM) was selected as the best-performing approach; therefore, all subsequent analyses use EQM-corrected data. Similarly, although nine CMIP6 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6) global climate models were initially assessed for each SSP, ACCESS-CM2 showed the highest agreement with observations and was thus used for all projections. Monthly and annual WPD changes reveal a pronounced seasonal asymmetry. During winter and late autumn (November–February), relative changes indicate enhanced wind potential in northern and northwestern Türkiye, while southern coastal regions tend to experience reductions, forming a recurring north–south dipole. January emerges as the most scenario-sensitive month: under SSP1-2.6 and SSP2-4.5, northern increases coexist with southern decreases, whereas SSP5-8.5 amplifies spatial contrasts rather than producing uniform change. February generally preserves this north-favored pattern, albeit with weaker contrasts. The warm season exhibits the clearest degradation in wind resources. April marks a transition month with widespread negative changes across much of the country. From May through August, persistently negative anomalies dominate large areas under all SSPs, indicating a systematic weakening of late-spring and summer wind potential. September shows limited and spatially heterogeneous recovery, while October and November display a pronounced rebound with widespread positive anomalies, particularly in northern regions, consistent with a return to stronger autumn circulation. Annual changes are comparatively muted, reflecting substantial compensation between cold-season gains and warm-season losses. Overall, the results demonstrate that climate change affects wind energy potential in Türkiye primarily through seasonal redistribution and increased intra-annual variability, highlighting the importance of scenario-based, month-resolved assessments rather than reliance on annual mean indicators alone. • A dual focus on the Marmara and Aegean coasts—regions with high but understudied wind energy potential. • Monthly-resolution wind power density projections to support operational optimization and seasonal planning. • Identification of Empirical Quantile Mapping (EQM) as the most accurate downscaling approach for future wind projections. • Integration of climate modeling, statistical bias correction, and energy policy implications within a unified framework.

Energy Strategy ReviewsVol. 64
Muş Alparslan University (TR), Siirt Üniversitesi (TR), University of Johannesburg (ZA), FKuR Kunststoff (Germany) (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.