Assessing automated vehicle-induced VMT: meta-analysis of current research

• Overall VMT increase of 5.95% for SAVs and non-shared AVs combined. • Non-shared AVs separately exhibited a higher impact (6.9%) compared to SAVs (5.33%). • Key factors include the value of travel time, system speed, AV penetration rate, and vehicle replacement rates. • Empty vehicles travel due to low-cost parking search, repositioning and travel for charging, induces extreme VMT increase. • Whereas, increased fleet size, compact distance for vehicle repositioning, and trip chaining may reduce VMT. Automated Vehicles (AVs) are rapidly transforming the transportation landscape. It is crucial to understand the impact of AVs on vehicle miles traveled (VMT), a key metric of travel behavior. Despite numerous systematic literature reviews, there is a lack of robust statistical analysis on this topic. This study fills this gap with a multivariate meta -analysis of 26 published articles, providing 195 effect sizes of AVs’ impact on VMT in U.S. cities and metropolitan areas. The analysis reveals a 5.95% increase in VMT for shared and non-shared AVs combined. Individually, shared automated vehicles (SAVs) show a 5.3% increase, while non-shared AVs demonstrate a greater increase of 6.9% in VMT. Additionally, a moderator variable analysis identifies factors influencing the impact of AVs on VMT, helping to explain variations in specific study outcomes. Among thirteen moderator variables, four significantly affect VMT. The results indicate that while AV deployment generally leads to increased VMT, higher operating costs and higher value of travel time (VOTT) can negatively impact VMT increase. In contrast, system speed, AV penetration rate, average travel time, and average trip distance positively influence the effect. In summary, AV deployment is anticipated to lead to an overall increase in VMT, with a greater impact observed for non-shared AVs compared to shared AVs. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and urban planners aiming to balance the benefits and potential drawbacks of AV technology in shaping future transportation systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Travel Behaviour and Society
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2026.101268
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing automated vehicle-induced VMT: meta-analysis of current research

Farah Naz, Stephen P. Mattingly
Travel Behaviour and Society
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
article

Assessing automated vehicle-induced VMT: meta-analysis of current research

Farah Naz, Stephen P. Mattingly
article en

Abstract

• Overall VMT increase of 5.95% for SAVs and non-shared AVs combined. • Non-shared AVs separately exhibited a higher impact (6.9%) compared to SAVs (5.33%). • Key factors include the value of travel time, system speed, AV penetration rate, and vehicle replacement rates. • Empty vehicles travel due to low-cost parking search, repositioning and travel for charging, induces extreme VMT increase. • Whereas, increased fleet size, compact distance for vehicle repositioning, and trip chaining may reduce VMT. Automated Vehicles (AVs) are rapidly transforming the transportation landscape. It is crucial to understand the impact of AVs on vehicle miles traveled (VMT), a key metric of travel behavior. Despite numerous systematic literature reviews, there is a lack of robust statistical analysis on this topic. This study fills this gap with a multivariate meta -analysis of 26 published articles, providing 195 effect sizes of AVs’ impact on VMT in U.S. cities and metropolitan areas. The analysis reveals a 5.95% increase in VMT for shared and non-shared AVs combined. Individually, shared automated vehicles (SAVs) show a 5.3% increase, while non-shared AVs demonstrate a greater increase of 6.9% in VMT. Additionally, a moderator variable analysis identifies factors influencing the impact of AVs on VMT, helping to explain variations in specific study outcomes. Among thirteen moderator variables, four significantly affect VMT. The results indicate that while AV deployment generally leads to increased VMT, higher operating costs and higher value of travel time (VOTT) can negatively impact VMT increase. In contrast, system speed, AV penetration rate, average travel time, and average trip distance positively influence the effect. In summary, AV deployment is anticipated to lead to an overall increase in VMT, with a greater impact observed for non-shared AVs compared to shared AVs. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and urban planners aiming to balance the benefits and potential drawbacks of AV technology in shaping future transportation systems.

Travel Behaviour and SocietyVol. 44
The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.