Characterization of the learning environment for teaching pharmaceutical care: a scoping review

A scoping review was conducted the databases: Pubmed (Medline), Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and ERIC. The search was conducted in July 2025, without restrictions of year or language. The methodological quality of studies was verified using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). 11 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this scoping review. They were published between 2010 and 2025, in the United States (n = 4), Malaysia (n = 2; 18.18%), Netherlands, Australia, United Kingdom, Kuwait, and Canada (n = 1; 9.09%). The target population was Pharmacy students. Physical and virtual environments were described, highlighting innovative approaches centered on the student, as follows: experience-based learning (EBL), problem-based learning (PBL), simulation, team-based learning, blended learning and online learning (e-learning). Personal, social, and organizational components were also identified. Innovative strategies have proven effective in the learning process of pharmaceutical care. However, it is important that these findings be reproducible in settings both inside and outside the university. Future research should deepen the understanding of learning environments for teaching Pharmaceutical Care to strengthen scientific production and guide the training of future pharmacists better prepared for patient-centered practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08876-7
Primary Topic
Problem and Project Based Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterization of the learning environment for teaching pharmaceutical care: a scoping review

Fernando de Castro Araújo-Neto, Thaís Maria Araújo Tavares, Mayara de Almeida Lima Ribeiro, Alessandra Rezende Mesquita et al.
BMC Medical Education
Problem and Project Based Learning
article

Characterization of the learning environment for teaching pharmaceutical care: a scoping review

Fernando de Castro Araújo-Neto, Thaís Maria Araújo Tavares, Mayara de Almeida Lima Ribeiro, Alessandra Rezende Mesquita, Giselle de Carvalho Brito, Dennis Wesley Andrade Hohenfeld
article en

Abstract

A scoping review was conducted the databases: Pubmed (Medline), Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and ERIC. The search was conducted in July 2025, without restrictions of year or language. The methodological quality of studies was verified using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). 11 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this scoping review. They were published between 2010 and 2025, in the United States (n = 4), Malaysia (n = 2; 18.18%), Netherlands, Australia, United Kingdom, Kuwait, and Canada (n = 1; 9.09%). The target population was Pharmacy students. Physical and virtual environments were described, highlighting innovative approaches centered on the student, as follows: experience-based learning (EBL), problem-based learning (PBL), simulation, team-based learning, blended learning and online learning (e-learning). Personal, social, and organizational components were also identified. Innovative strategies have proven effective in the learning process of pharmaceutical care. However, it is important that these findings be reproducible in settings both inside and outside the university. Future research should deepen the understanding of learning environments for teaching Pharmaceutical Care to strengthen scientific production and guide the training of future pharmacists better prepared for patient-centered practices.

BMC Medical Education
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Universidade Federal de Sergipe (BR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Problem and Project Based Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.