Dark Energy under Ontological Discipline: a critical–propositional reading of Rajesh More's review in light of the Theory of Objectivity (TO)

This work presents “Dark Energy under Ontological Discipline: a critical–propositional reading of Rajesh More’s review in light of the Theory of Objectivity (TO)”, a full scientific article that confronts Rajesh More’s literature review of mathematical dark-energy models with the modal, logical–ontological foundations of the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The article begins from the diagnosis made explicit by More: despite increasing mathematical sophistication and growing observational constraints, dark energy remains ontologically unresolved. In response, TO is employed as an ontological discipline—not to replace standard cosmology or contemporary models, but to argue that any physically coherent model of a possible universe must be grounded in a prior basis of modal necessity, derived from TO’s Seven Axioms (Seven Absolute Truths). This claim is further articulated through an independent assessment developed in dialogue with Artificial Intelligences, which systematizes coherence criteria and proposes testability and predictability methods for TO’s phenomenic elements and cosmological eras. At its propositional core, the article argues that cosmic acceleration can be reinterpreted as a late-time regime phenomenon, associated with TO’s cosmological eras and its inductor effects: the Expansive Inductor Effect (EIE) (axioms 4 and 5) and the Reductive Inductor Effect (EIR) (axioms 4, 5, and 6). Within this framework, terms such as Λ and w(z)-type parameterizations can be understood as phenomenological regime descriptors, reducing dependence on ad hoc entities. The article also adopts, as an operational bridge, the hypothesis that neutrinos may be phenomenic manifestations of the plasmas described in TO’s early eras. The paper reaffirms that TO is not merely philosophical: it advances a complete theorem of universal genesis through a proprietary (graphical and deductive) mathematical language, in which a universe emerges from an eternal, static perfect logical sphere prior to time, space, and matter—whose structure (64 straight logical parts on the maximal circumference and 2048 logical parts across the total surface) follows from the modal necessity of the axioms and is corroborated by additional logical and graphical demonstrations. The article concludes with a TO-standard Appendix, including a phenomenic matrix, the law of logical minimum, and operational bridges for reinterpretation of observational datasets (CMB/Planck, LIGO/Virgo, and JWST) in dialogue with contemporary physics. Keywords: dark energy; cosmological constant; quintessence; modified gravity; modal necessity; ontology; Theory of Objectivity; perfect sphere; inductor effects; testability; predictability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18761706
Primary Topic
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dark Energy under Ontological Discipline: a critical–propositional reading of Rajesh More's review in light of the Theory of Objectivity (TO)

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
article

Dark Energy under Ontological Discipline: a critical–propositional reading of Rajesh More's review in light of the Theory of Objectivity (TO)

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
article en

Abstract

This work presents “Dark Energy under Ontological Discipline: a critical–propositional reading of Rajesh More’s review in light of the Theory of Objectivity (TO)”, a full scientific article that confronts Rajesh More’s literature review of mathematical dark-energy models with the modal, logical–ontological foundations of the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The article begins from the diagnosis made explicit by More: despite increasing mathematical sophistication and growing observational constraints, dark energy remains ontologically unresolved. In response, TO is employed as an ontological discipline—not to replace standard cosmology or contemporary models, but to argue that any physically coherent model of a possible universe must be grounded in a prior basis of modal necessity, derived from TO’s Seven Axioms (Seven Absolute Truths). This claim is further articulated through an independent assessment developed in dialogue with Artificial Intelligences, which systematizes coherence criteria and proposes testability and predictability methods for TO’s phenomenic elements and cosmological eras. At its propositional core, the article argues that cosmic acceleration can be reinterpreted as a late-time regime phenomenon, associated with TO’s cosmological eras and its inductor effects: the Expansive Inductor Effect (EIE) (axioms 4 and 5) and the Reductive Inductor Effect (EIR) (axioms 4, 5, and 6). Within this framework, terms such as Λ and w(z)-type parameterizations can be understood as phenomenological regime descriptors, reducing dependence on ad hoc entities. The article also adopts, as an operational bridge, the hypothesis that neutrinos may be phenomenic manifestations of the plasmas described in TO’s early eras. The paper reaffirms that TO is not merely philosophical: it advances a complete theorem of universal genesis through a proprietary (graphical and deductive) mathematical language, in which a universe emerges from an eternal, static perfect logical sphere prior to time, space, and matter—whose structure (64 straight logical parts on the maximal circumference and 2048 logical parts across the total surface) follows from the modal necessity of the axioms and is corroborated by additional logical and graphical demonstrations. The article concludes with a TO-standard Appendix, including a phenomenic matrix, the law of logical minimum, and operational bridges for reinterpretation of observational datasets (CMB/Planck, LIGO/Virgo, and JWST) in dialogue with contemporary physics. Keywords: dark energy; cosmological constant; quintessence; modified gravity; modal necessity; ontology; Theory of Objectivity; perfect sphere; inductor effects; testability; predictability.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.