Spillover of Female Labor Protection: Evidence from China

This study examines the gendered consequences of China’s 2012 Female Labor Protection Policy (FLP), introduced to enhance workplace protections through extended maternity leave, standardized allowances, job restrictions, and penalties for non-compliant employers. Using a triple-differences (DDD) identification strategy and data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), we separate the effects of the FLP from contemporaneous family-planning reforms. Although the FLP aimed to improve women’s work–life balance, our findings reveal large wage penalties that fall disproportionately on women—especially older female workers—rather than being confined to those of childbearing age. We find no evidence that the policy increases women’s labor force participation or fertility. These results suggest that well-intentioned gender-focused labor regulations can generate unintended adverse consequences, reinforcing workplace inequality and exacerbating the motherhood penalty. Our study contributes to feminist analyses of labor regulation by highlighting how protective legislation can inadvertently strengthen age- and gender-based wage biases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Labor Research
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-026-09379-6
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spillover of Female Labor Protection: Evidence from China

Jiawen Liu, Xin Liu
Journal of Labor Research
Work-Family Balance Challenges
article

Spillover of Female Labor Protection: Evidence from China

Jiawen Liu, Xin Liu
article en

Abstract

This study examines the gendered consequences of China’s 2012 Female Labor Protection Policy (FLP), introduced to enhance workplace protections through extended maternity leave, standardized allowances, job restrictions, and penalties for non-compliant employers. Using a triple-differences (DDD) identification strategy and data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), we separate the effects of the FLP from contemporaneous family-planning reforms. Although the FLP aimed to improve women’s work–life balance, our findings reveal large wage penalties that fall disproportionately on women—especially older female workers—rather than being confined to those of childbearing age. We find no evidence that the policy increases women’s labor force participation or fertility. These results suggest that well-intentioned gender-focused labor regulations can generate unintended adverse consequences, reinforcing workplace inequality and exacerbating the motherhood penalty. Our study contributes to feminist analyses of labor regulation by highlighting how protective legislation can inadvertently strengthen age- and gender-based wage biases.

Journal of Labor ResearchVol. 47(1)
Michigan State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.