Quantitative Ultrasound As an Alternative Method for Assessment and Grading of Hepatic Steatosis: A Comparison Study with Quantitative MRI-Proton Density Fat Fraction

Abstract Although liver biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, non-invasive imaging is essential for population screening, risk assessment, and monitoring treatment. New ultrasonic techniques enable quantitative assessment of steatosis in individuals with hepatic metabolic disorders, offering an alternative noninvasive screening method. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative ultrasound fat fraction (USFF) in detecting and grading hepatic steatosis, using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) as the reference standard. In this single-center prospective study (January 2024–July 2025), 40 consecutive adults (average age 57.83 ± 15.7 years; 14 men) referred for liver fat measurement underwent multivariable quantitative ultrasound (Samsung V7, convex probe CA 1–7 MHz) and 1.5-T MRI within 24 hours. After fasting for at least 4 hours, five reliable ultrasound acquisitions (reliability index R 2 ≥ 0.60) of tissue attenuation imaging (TAI) and tissue scatter-distribution imaging (TSI) were obtained through a right intercostal window, and their means were automatically converted to USFF (%). MRI-PDFF maps were created using a six-echo spoiled gradient-echo sequence with multi-peak fat modeling and T2* correction. Steatosis grades were classified on USFF and PDFF as S0 (0–5%), S1 ( ≥ 5%), S2 ( ≥ 15%), and S3 (>25%). Pearson correlation and weighted κ statistics were used for analysis (SPSS v20). MRI-PDFF classified 15/40 (37.5%) of the livers as S0, 19/40 (47.5%) as S1, 3/40 (7.5%) as S2, and 3/40 (7.5%) as S3. The corresponding USFF distribution was S0 for 8/40 (20%), S1 for 19/40 (47.5%), S2 for 8/40 (20%), and S3 for 5/40 (12.5%). USFF showed a strong correlation with MRI-PDFF (r = 0.912; 99% CI 0.805–0.961; p < 0.001). Quantitative ultrasound shows excellent correlation and strong agreement with MRI-PDFF for both detection and grading of hepatic steatosis. Given its low cost, real-time capability, and wide availability, USFF is a practical alternative for routine assessment and ongoing monitoring of hepatic fat.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian journal of radiology and imaging - new series/Indian journal of radiology and imaging/Indian Journal of Radiology & Imaging
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1817156
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Ultrasound As an Alternative Method for Assessment and Grading of Hepatic Steatosis: A Comparison Study with Quantitative MRI-Proton Density Fat Fraction

Thi Ngoc Ha Hoang, Thi Duyen Nguyen, Toan Nguyen, Ngoc Thanh Hoang et al.
Indian journal of radiology and imaging - new series/Indian journal of radiology and imaging/Indian Journal of Radiology & Imaging
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Quantitative Ultrasound As an Alternative Method for Assessment and Grading of Hepatic Steatosis: A Comparison Study with Quantitative MRI-Proton Density Fat Fraction

Thi Ngoc Ha Hoang, Thi Duyen Nguyen, Toan Nguyen, Ngoc Thanh Hoang, Trong Binh Le
article en

Abstract

Abstract Although liver biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, non-invasive imaging is essential for population screening, risk assessment, and monitoring treatment. New ultrasonic techniques enable quantitative assessment of steatosis in individuals with hepatic metabolic disorders, offering an alternative noninvasive screening method. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative ultrasound fat fraction (USFF) in detecting and grading hepatic steatosis, using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) as the reference standard. In this single-center prospective study (January 2024–July 2025), 40 consecutive adults (average age 57.83 ± 15.7 years; 14 men) referred for liver fat measurement underwent multivariable quantitative ultrasound (Samsung V7, convex probe CA 1–7 MHz) and 1.5-T MRI within 24 hours. After fasting for at least 4 hours, five reliable ultrasound acquisitions (reliability index R 2 ≥ 0.60) of tissue attenuation imaging (TAI) and tissue scatter-distribution imaging (TSI) were obtained through a right intercostal window, and their means were automatically converted to USFF (%). MRI-PDFF maps were created using a six-echo spoiled gradient-echo sequence with multi-peak fat modeling and T2* correction. Steatosis grades were classified on USFF and PDFF as S0 (0–5%), S1 ( ≥ 5%), S2 ( ≥ 15%), and S3 (>25%). Pearson correlation and weighted κ statistics were used for analysis (SPSS v20). MRI-PDFF classified 15/40 (37.5%) of the livers as S0, 19/40 (47.5%) as S1, 3/40 (7.5%) as S2, and 3/40 (7.5%) as S3. The corresponding USFF distribution was S0 for 8/40 (20%), S1 for 19/40 (47.5%), S2 for 8/40 (20%), and S3 for 5/40 (12.5%). USFF showed a strong correlation with MRI-PDFF (r = 0.912; 99% CI 0.805–0.961; p < 0.001). Quantitative ultrasound shows excellent correlation and strong agreement with MRI-PDFF for both detection and grading of hepatic steatosis. Given its low cost, real-time capability, and wide availability, USFF is a practical alternative for routine assessment and ongoing monitoring of hepatic fat.

Indian journal of radiology and imaging - new series/Indian journal of radiology and imaging/Indian Journal of Radiology & Imaging
Hue University (VN)
Đại học Huế
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.