Reflective analysis in radiography research: Methodological foundations and reporting guidance

The RAD-RA framework supports rigorous, transparent, and ethically accountable reflective research, enabling radiographers to examine professional judgement and practice-based challenges while supporting consistent peer review and qualitative scholarship within the discipline. As artificial intelligence increasingly shapes clinical workflows, decision support, and professional roles in radiography, reflective analysis provides a structured qualitative method for examining how practitioners interpret, negotiate, and respond to AI-supported practice. The RAD-RA framework offers a defensible approach for analysing these emerging interactions, supporting qualitative inquiry into human-AI relationships, professional accountability, and practice implications within radiography.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiography
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2026.103362
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reflective analysis in radiography research: Methodological foundations and reporting guidance

T.N. Akudjedu, S. Chau, K. Spuur, J.L. Ago et al.
1 citations
Radiography
Radiology practices and education
31.92
article

Reflective analysis in radiography research: Methodological foundations and reporting guidance

T.N. Akudjedu, S. Chau, K. Spuur, J.L. Ago, C. Singh, B. Ofori-Manteaw, H. Kerr
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The RAD-RA framework supports rigorous, transparent, and ethically accountable reflective research, enabling radiographers to examine professional judgement and practice-based challenges while supporting consistent peer review and qualitative scholarship within the discipline. As artificial intelligence increasingly shapes clinical workflows, decision support, and professional roles in radiography, reflective analysis provides a structured qualitative method for examining how practitioners interpret, negotiate, and respond to AI-supported practice. The RAD-RA framework offers a defensible approach for analysing these emerging interactions, supporting qualitative inquiry into human-AI relationships, professional accountability, and practice implications within radiography.

RadiographyVol. 32(3)
Charles Sturt University (AU), RMIT University (AU), Bournemouth University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Radiology practices and education
31.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.