Exploring the Interpretive Clarity of the TCCNI-RePract and Identifying Conceptual Barriers Encountered by Japanese Psychiatric Nurses: A Concurrent Mixed-Methods Study

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Integrating technology with caring is essential in modern healthcare, yet the clinical applicability of nursing theories remains underexplored. Locsin's Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing (TCCN) theory emphasizes the competent use of technology to address patients holistically, rather than focusing solely on health concerns. Here, we explored the interpretive clarity of the TCCN Instrument-Revised for Practice (TCCNI-RePract) items and identified the conceptual barriers encountered by psychiatric nurses when engaging with its theoretical constructs. <b>Methods</b>: This concurrent mixed-methods study surveyed 291 psychiatric nurses across five large hospitals in the Kansai region of Japan. Quantitative data on the TCCNI-RePract perception dimension were examined using descriptive statistics and normality testing. Qualitative open-ended responses were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. To ensure rigor and integration, a joint display was utilized to bridge both data strands. <b>Results</b>: Quantitative findings indicated that nurses strongly endorsed core values of caring (high agreement) but perceived theoretical constructs (wholeness and technological knowing) as significantly more difficult to interpret than concrete, behavior-oriented items. Qualitative analysis revealed four major themes: (1) fragmented understanding of "technology and caring," (2) struggles with abstract and philosophical language, (3) moral and emotional tensions in caring relationships, and (4) contextual barriers to integrating caring and technology. We found a "semantic gap," where the professional endorsement of caring values was not automatically translated into the mastery of theoretical lexicon. <b>Conclusions</b>: While psychiatric nurses identify with the moral core of TCCN, a substantial gap exists between abstract theory and clinical practice. For effectiveness, middle-range theories require "clinical translation" that resonates with the moral, emotional, and organizational realities of psychiatric settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Reports
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep16030077
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Interpretive Clarity of the TCCNI-RePract and Identifying Conceptual Barriers Encountered by Japanese Psychiatric Nurses: A Concurrent Mixed-Methods Study

Yoshiyuki Takashima, Tetsuya Tanioka, Kyoko Osaka, Yuko Yasuhara et al.
Nursing Reports
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Exploring the Interpretive Clarity of the TCCNI-RePract and Identifying Conceptual Barriers Encountered by Japanese Psychiatric Nurses: A Concurrent Mixed-Methods Study

Yoshiyuki Takashima, Tetsuya Tanioka, Kyoko Osaka, Yuko Yasuhara, Hirokazu Ito, Allan Paulo Blaquera, Gil Platon Soriano
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Integrating technology with caring is essential in modern healthcare, yet the clinical applicability of nursing theories remains underexplored. Locsin's Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing (TCCN) theory emphasizes the competent use of technology to address patients holistically, rather than focusing solely on health concerns. Here, we explored the interpretive clarity of the TCCN Instrument-Revised for Practice (TCCNI-RePract) items and identified the conceptual barriers encountered by psychiatric nurses when engaging with its theoretical constructs. <b>Methods</b>: This concurrent mixed-methods study surveyed 291 psychiatric nurses across five large hospitals in the Kansai region of Japan. Quantitative data on the TCCNI-RePract perception dimension were examined using descriptive statistics and normality testing. Qualitative open-ended responses were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. To ensure rigor and integration, a joint display was utilized to bridge both data strands. <b>Results</b>: Quantitative findings indicated that nurses strongly endorsed core values of caring (high agreement) but perceived theoretical constructs (wholeness and technological knowing) as significantly more difficult to interpret than concrete, behavior-oriented items. Qualitative analysis revealed four major themes: (1) fragmented understanding of "technology and caring," (2) struggles with abstract and philosophical language, (3) moral and emotional tensions in caring relationships, and (4) contextual barriers to integrating caring and technology. We found a "semantic gap," where the professional endorsement of caring values was not automatically translated into the mastery of theoretical lexicon. <b>Conclusions</b>: While psychiatric nurses identify with the moral core of TCCN, a substantial gap exists between abstract theory and clinical practice. For effectiveness, middle-range theories require "clinical translation" that resonates with the moral, emotional, and organizational realities of psychiatric settings.

Nursing ReportsVol. 16(3)
Nara University (JP), National University (PH), Nara Medical University Hospital (JP), St. Paul University Philippines (PH), University of the Philippines Manila (PH), Nara Medical University (JP), Kōchi University (JP), Tokushima University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.