Generalized Method for Comparative Analysis of Fuzz-Testing Tools

A systematic analysis of methods for evaluating the effectiveness of fuzzers is conducted. A minimal but complete set of metrics is identified: branch coverage, number of unique crashes, and time to first crash. A normalized integral indicator is proposed that allows post hoc comparison of the results of different tools without reruns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Automatic Control and Computer Sciences
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3103/s0146411625700774
Primary Topic
VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generalized Method for Comparative Analysis of Fuzz-Testing Tools

R. A. Ognev, D. P. Zegzhda
Automatic Control and Computer Sciences
VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
article

Generalized Method for Comparative Analysis of Fuzz-Testing Tools

R. A. Ognev, D. P. Zegzhda
article en

Abstract

A systematic analysis of methods for evaluating the effectiveness of fuzzers is conducted. A minimal but complete set of metrics is identified: branch coverage, number of unique crashes, and time to first crash. A normalized integral indicator is proposed that allows post hoc comparison of the results of different tools without reruns.

Automatic Control and Computer SciencesVol. 59(8)
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.