“Am Anfang Heil, Am Ende Wirren”: Reconsiderations of the Significance of Richard Wilhelm’s <i>I Ging</i> (1924) and His Recorded Aleatory Practices (1917–1920)

Abstract Two main reconsiderations related to Richard Wilhelm’s German translation of the I Ging are explored here. The first deals with the distinctive Christian tone of the text and its relationship to a cross-cultural German Lutheran — Chinese Ruist (“Confucian”) spiritual synthesis that I propose Wilhelm had innovatively created. Largely unknown to others is the fact that Wilhelm practiced and recorded Yijing aleatory acts in a period from about 1917 to 1920, which are described in detail as part of this unusual spiritual synthesis. The second is based upon a careful comparison of Wilhelm’s I Ging published in 1924 and the English rendering produced by Cary F. Baynes in 1950, through which I argue that Baynes’s translation eliminates the Christian tone of the German translation, and unjustifiably adds Jungian psychological terminology to the text as if it is Wilhelm’s own. On the foundation of these two reconsiderations, therefore, I suggest ways to articulate a more nuanced account of the history of reception of Richard Wilhelm’s I Ging .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cowrie
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/cwl-2025-2015
Primary Topic
Jungian Analytical Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Am Anfang Heil, Am Ende Wirren”: Reconsiderations of the Significance of Richard Wilhelm’s I Ging (1924) and His Recorded Aleatory Practices (1917–1920)

Lauren F. Pfister
Cowrie
Jungian Analytical Psychology
article

“Am Anfang Heil, Am Ende Wirren”: Reconsiderations of the Significance of Richard Wilhelm’s I Ging (1924) and His Recorded Aleatory Practices (1917–1920)

Lauren F. Pfister
article en

Abstract

Abstract Two main reconsiderations related to Richard Wilhelm’s German translation of the I Ging are explored here. The first deals with the distinctive Christian tone of the text and its relationship to a cross-cultural German Lutheran — Chinese Ruist (“Confucian”) spiritual synthesis that I propose Wilhelm had innovatively created. Largely unknown to others is the fact that Wilhelm practiced and recorded Yijing aleatory acts in a period from about 1917 to 1920, which are described in detail as part of this unusual spiritual synthesis. The second is based upon a careful comparison of Wilhelm’s I Ging published in 1924 and the English rendering produced by Cary F. Baynes in 1950, through which I argue that Baynes’s translation eliminates the Christian tone of the German translation, and unjustifiably adds Jungian psychological terminology to the text as if it is Wilhelm’s own. On the foundation of these two reconsiderations, therefore, I suggest ways to articulate a more nuanced account of the history of reception of Richard Wilhelm’s I Ging .

Cowrie
Hong Kong Baptist University (HK), Akhbar El Yom Academy (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Jungian Analytical Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.