Global surgery teaching content in German universities: a mixed-method descriptive study

Despite increasing awareness of Global Surgery for surgeons worldwide for collaboration and exchange of resources with the final goal of making essential surgery available to all, only a few universities have included Global Surgery content in medical education. Ten years after the Lancet Commission report for Global Surgery, this descriptive study aimed to clarify the current status of teaching content on Global Surgery in German universities. In a mixed-method approach, all medical faculties in Germany were evaluated via a survey and available information on existing courses to clarify the teaching content of Global Surgery in Global Health-related programs. Practical training was highlighted. Statistical analysis and comparative studies using the Pearson chi-square test between types of programs, regions, and universities were performed. Of the 45 universities, 36 (80%) offered one or several programs on Global Health, resulting in 81 programs, with the majority being Electives (n = 54; 66%). Global surgery content was included in seventeen universities (37%), including twenty-eight programs (34%), whereas four (14%) contained practical training. Educational hubs for Global Surgery seem to be Munich, Berlin, and Bonn. The reasons for the limited integration of Global Surgery in medical education are the current focus of programs and the lack of expertise and personnel. Most universities have incorporated Global Health into German medical education, but Global Surgery remains insufficiently represented, with limited teaching, scarce practical training, and fragmented institutional structures. Coordinated national strategies are needed to strengthen faculty capacity, integrate Global Surgery into existing curricula, and expand collaborative opportunities to prepare future health-care professionals to address global surgical inequities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08856-x
Primary Topic
Global Health and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global surgery teaching content in German universities: a mixed-method descriptive study

Judith Lindert, Linnéa Weise, C Fischer, Jarooshen Jayasingam
BMC Medical Education
Global Health and Surgery
article

Global surgery teaching content in German universities: a mixed-method descriptive study

Judith Lindert, Linnéa Weise, C Fischer, Jarooshen Jayasingam
article en

Abstract

Despite increasing awareness of Global Surgery for surgeons worldwide for collaboration and exchange of resources with the final goal of making essential surgery available to all, only a few universities have included Global Surgery content in medical education. Ten years after the Lancet Commission report for Global Surgery, this descriptive study aimed to clarify the current status of teaching content on Global Surgery in German universities. In a mixed-method approach, all medical faculties in Germany were evaluated via a survey and available information on existing courses to clarify the teaching content of Global Surgery in Global Health-related programs. Practical training was highlighted. Statistical analysis and comparative studies using the Pearson chi-square test between types of programs, regions, and universities were performed. Of the 45 universities, 36 (80%) offered one or several programs on Global Health, resulting in 81 programs, with the majority being Electives (n = 54; 66%). Global surgery content was included in seventeen universities (37%), including twenty-eight programs (34%), whereas four (14%) contained practical training. Educational hubs for Global Surgery seem to be Munich, Berlin, and Bonn. The reasons for the limited integration of Global Surgery in medical education are the current focus of programs and the lack of expertise and personnel. Most universities have incorporated Global Health into German medical education, but Global Surgery remains insufficiently represented, with limited teaching, scarce practical training, and fragmented institutional structures. Coordinated national strategies are needed to strengthen faculty capacity, integrate Global Surgery into existing curricula, and expand collaborative opportunities to prepare future health-care professionals to address global surgical inequities.

BMC Medical EducationVol. 26(1)
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE), University Hospital Bonn (DE), German Respiratory Society (DE), Deutsche Telekom (Germany) (DE), University of Rostock (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Global Health and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.