Effects of <i>Pinus sylvestris</i> var. <i>mongolica</i> reforestation on soil properties after 30 years of postfire recovery—comparison with old-growth natural forests

Abstract Boreal forests play crucial roles in sustaining carbon sequestration but are increasingly threatened by severe wildfires. Wildfires not only reduce available timber and release carbon but may also negatively affect soil properties with potential effects on the reestablishment of planted and natural forests. In the Greater Khingan Range region of Northeast China (52°N ~ 53.5°N), large-scale reforestation efforts were conducted in 1988–90 in which Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica (Mongolian pine) was used to restore ecological functions after severe wildfires. However, the status of soil restoration in the Mongolian pine reforestation plantations remains unclear. In this study, we assessed and compared stand characteristics and soil properties from 0 to 40 cm soil depth in both Mongolian pine plantations and old-growth natural Mongolian pine forests (hereafter referred to as natural forests). While the vegetation biomass of the reforested stands was found to be quite similar to that of the natural forests, the results indicate that the litter stock in Mongolian pine plantations was 49.8% lower than that in natural forests. Soil nutrient contents in plantations were 31.9%–36.9% lower than those in natural forests at the 0–10 cm soil depth. There were no significant differences in soil nutrient contents between plantations and natural forests at the 10–20 and 20–40 cm soil depths except for the nitrogen content, which was significantly lower by 31.3% in plantations compared to that of natural forests at the 10–20 cm soil depth. Furthermore, the enzyme activities, particularly β-glucosidase and exoglucanase, were 30.7% and 29.3% lower in plantations compared with those of natural forests at the 0–10 cm soil depth, respectively. At 10–20 and 20–40 cm soil depths, β-glucosidase and exoglucanase activities were, on average, 17.9% and 2.6% lower, respectively, but these differences were not statistically significant. The positive correlations between litter stock, enzyme activities, and soil carbon and nitrogen contents highlight the critical role of litter input and microbial processes in maintaining soil fertility. Notably, the soil carbon and nitrogen contents in plantations reached ~60% of those in natural forests at the 0–10 cm soil depth. Our findings suggest that while vegetation biomass was recovered comparably well 30 years postwildfire, soil functioning did not yet reach the same level as the old-growth forest. We note that wildfire management to prevent additional wildfires may be important to give soils more time to recover in the study area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpag016
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica reforestation on soil properties after 30 years of postfire recovery—comparison with old-growth natural forests

Yingjia Su, Jesse Zhu, Shuai Xu, C. Zhou et al.
Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Effects of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica reforestation on soil properties after 30 years of postfire recovery—comparison with old-growth natural forests

Yingjia Su, Jesse Zhu, Shuai Xu, C. Zhou, Qian Zhang, Kai Yang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Boreal forests play crucial roles in sustaining carbon sequestration but are increasingly threatened by severe wildfires. Wildfires not only reduce available timber and release carbon but may also negatively affect soil properties with potential effects on the reestablishment of planted and natural forests. In the Greater Khingan Range region of Northeast China (52°N ~ 53.5°N), large-scale reforestation efforts were conducted in 1988–90 in which Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica (Mongolian pine) was used to restore ecological functions after severe wildfires. However, the status of soil restoration in the Mongolian pine reforestation plantations remains unclear. In this study, we assessed and compared stand characteristics and soil properties from 0 to 40 cm soil depth in both Mongolian pine plantations and old-growth natural Mongolian pine forests (hereafter referred to as natural forests). While the vegetation biomass of the reforested stands was found to be quite similar to that of the natural forests, the results indicate that the litter stock in Mongolian pine plantations was 49.8% lower than that in natural forests. Soil nutrient contents in plantations were 31.9%–36.9% lower than those in natural forests at the 0–10 cm soil depth. There were no significant differences in soil nutrient contents between plantations and natural forests at the 10–20 and 20–40 cm soil depths except for the nitrogen content, which was significantly lower by 31.3% in plantations compared to that of natural forests at the 10–20 cm soil depth. Furthermore, the enzyme activities, particularly β-glucosidase and exoglucanase, were 30.7% and 29.3% lower in plantations compared with those of natural forests at the 0–10 cm soil depth, respectively. At 10–20 and 20–40 cm soil depths, β-glucosidase and exoglucanase activities were, on average, 17.9% and 2.6% lower, respectively, but these differences were not statistically significant. The positive correlations between litter stock, enzyme activities, and soil carbon and nitrogen contents highlight the critical role of litter input and microbial processes in maintaining soil fertility. Notably, the soil carbon and nitrogen contents in plantations reached ~60% of those in natural forests at the 0–10 cm soil depth. Our findings suggest that while vegetation biomass was recovered comparably well 30 years postwildfire, soil functioning did not yet reach the same level as the old-growth forest. We note that wildfire management to prevent additional wildfires may be important to give soils more time to recover in the study area.

Forestry An International Journal of Forest ResearchVol. 99(2)
Institute of Applied Ecology (CN), Forest Research (GB), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.