The Early Safety Signal of Sacituzumab Govitecan-Related Toxicity and the UGT1A1*28 Genotype in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Real-World Preliminary Report

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) releases SN-38, the same active metabolite as irinotecan, thereby sharing key metabolic pathways and toxicity mechanisms. The clearance of SN-38 is strongly influenced by <i>UGT1A1</i> polymorphisms, particularly the <i>UGT1A1*28</i> allele. While <i>UGT1A1*28</i> genotyping routinely guides irinotecan dosing, no such recommendations exist for SG. This study describes the relationship between <i>UGT1A1*28</i> and severe SG-related toxicity in real-world practice, identifying early safety signals and exploring the clinical and economic impact. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective observational study (2021-2025) included patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with SG and patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies treated with irinotecan at a tertiary hospital. In the SG cohort, genotyping followed grade ≥3 toxicity; in the irinotecan cohort, it was performed prospectively. Toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0) and healthcare costs related to hospitalizations were estimated using official institutional tariffs. <b>Results:</b> All nine SG patients with severe toxicity (100%) carried the <i>UGT1A1*28</i> allele. In the irinotecan cohort (n = 74), which was managed with genotype-guided dosing, severe toxicity and hospitalization were less frequent. SG was associated with higher mean costs per treated patient (€2817.01 vs. €1233.63), driven by toxicity-related admissions (33.3% vs. 10.8%). Genotyping costs (€10.51) were negligible compared to daily hospitalization expenses (up to €1984.90). <b>Conclusions:</b> Severe SG-related toxicity reveals a consistent <i>UGT1A1*28</i>-associated vulnerability. Given the drug's recent approval in Spain, these data represent an urgent real-world safety signal. The marked disparity between low genotyping costs and high hospitalization expenses supports implementing preventive <i>UGT1A1</i> testing to optimize the safety and sustainability of sacituzumab govitecan therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15051715
Primary Topic
Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Early Safety Signal of Sacituzumab Govitecan-Related Toxicity and the UGT1A1*28 Genotype in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Real-World Preliminary Report

Isabel Blancas, Emilio Fernández-Varón, X Díaz-Villamarín, J Cabeza-Barrera et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
article

The Early Safety Signal of Sacituzumab Govitecan-Related Toxicity and the UGT1A1*28 Genotype in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Real-World Preliminary Report

Isabel Blancas, Emilio Fernández-Varón, X Díaz-Villamarín, J Cabeza-Barrera, María Teresa Nieto-Sánchez, Alicia Torres-García, María Jesús Martínez-Pérez, Rocio Moron, Alvaro Prados-Carmona, M. Legerén
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) releases SN-38, the same active metabolite as irinotecan, thereby sharing key metabolic pathways and toxicity mechanisms. The clearance of SN-38 is strongly influenced by <i>UGT1A1</i> polymorphisms, particularly the <i>UGT1A1*28</i> allele. While <i>UGT1A1*28</i> genotyping routinely guides irinotecan dosing, no such recommendations exist for SG. This study describes the relationship between <i>UGT1A1*28</i> and severe SG-related toxicity in real-world practice, identifying early safety signals and exploring the clinical and economic impact. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective observational study (2021-2025) included patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with SG and patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies treated with irinotecan at a tertiary hospital. In the SG cohort, genotyping followed grade ≥3 toxicity; in the irinotecan cohort, it was performed prospectively. Toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0) and healthcare costs related to hospitalizations were estimated using official institutional tariffs. <b>Results:</b> All nine SG patients with severe toxicity (100%) carried the <i>UGT1A1*28</i> allele. In the irinotecan cohort (n = 74), which was managed with genotype-guided dosing, severe toxicity and hospitalization were less frequent. SG was associated with higher mean costs per treated patient (€2817.01 vs. €1233.63), driven by toxicity-related admissions (33.3% vs. 10.8%). Genotyping costs (€10.51) were negligible compared to daily hospitalization expenses (up to €1984.90). <b>Conclusions:</b> Severe SG-related toxicity reveals a consistent <i>UGT1A1*28</i>-associated vulnerability. Given the drug's recent approval in Spain, these data represent an urgent real-world safety signal. The marked disparity between low genotyping costs and high hospitalization expenses supports implementing preventive <i>UGT1A1</i> testing to optimize the safety and sustainability of sacituzumab govitecan therapy.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(5)
Universidad de Granada (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ES), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Good health and well-being, Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.