Sir Patrick Elias and the Right to Strike

Abstract This paper addresses Sir Patrick Elias's contribution to the right to strike, looking particularly at RMT v Serco Ltd; ASLEF v London & Birmingham RailwayLtd (2011). The decision brought to an end an intense period in which employers were able to obtain injunctions to prevent or discontinue industrial action, sometimes on what appeared to be insubstantial grounds. In doing so, the Court of Appeal reset the judicial approach to industrial action, acknowledging the ‘right to strike’ with implications for the substance of the law as well as the law relating to remedies. The paper explores the background to the decision and explains the significance of its content, while also assessing its impact and implications. In doing so, attention is devoted to the recent decision of the Irish Supreme Court in H A O’Neil Ltd v Unite the Union (2024) which expressly adopted an important passage from Serco, but in doing so raised important questions about the future development of the economic torts which continue to form the foundation of legal liability during industrial action

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial Law Journal
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwaf027
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sir Patrick Elias and the Right to Strike

K D Ewing
Industrial Law Journal
Labor Movements and Unions
article

Sir Patrick Elias and the Right to Strike

K D Ewing
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper addresses Sir Patrick Elias's contribution to the right to strike, looking particularly at RMT v Serco Ltd; ASLEF v London & Birmingham RailwayLtd (2011). The decision brought to an end an intense period in which employers were able to obtain injunctions to prevent or discontinue industrial action, sometimes on what appeared to be insubstantial grounds. In doing so, the Court of Appeal reset the judicial approach to industrial action, acknowledging the ‘right to strike’ with implications for the substance of the law as well as the law relating to remedies. The paper explores the background to the decision and explains the significance of its content, while also assessing its impact and implications. In doing so, attention is devoted to the recent decision of the Irish Supreme Court in H A O’Neil Ltd v Unite the Union (2024) which expressly adopted an important passage from Serco, but in doing so raised important questions about the future development of the economic torts which continue to form the foundation of legal liability during industrial action

Industrial Law JournalVol. 54(4)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.