How Scientific Consensus Messaging Promotes Public Support for Socially Good AI: The Moderating Role of Collective Scientific Efficacy

This study investigated how scientific consensus messaging influences public support for socially good artificial intelligence (AI), drawing on the gateway belief model. Two preregistered experiments found that consensus messages increased support for AI research and willingness to raise awareness indirectly through increasing perceived consensus, which enhanced favorable beliefs and hope. These effects varied by collective scientific efficacy—perceived ability of scientists to work together effectively. Belief-based pathways were stronger under low efficacy, while hope-based pathways were stronger under high efficacy. Findings underscore the value of combining consensus and efficacy cues in science communication to promote engagement with emerging technologies like AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Communication
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470261420148
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Scientific Consensus Messaging Promotes Public Support for Socially Good AI: The Moderating Role of Collective Scientific Efficacy

Wenbo Li, Shuning Lu, Xia Zheng, Shan Xu et al.
Science Communication
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

How Scientific Consensus Messaging Promotes Public Support for Socially Good AI: The Moderating Role of Collective Scientific Efficacy

Wenbo Li, Shuning Lu, Xia Zheng, Shan Xu, Hailey Lantigua
article en

Abstract

This study investigated how scientific consensus messaging influences public support for socially good artificial intelligence (AI), drawing on the gateway belief model. Two preregistered experiments found that consensus messages increased support for AI research and willingness to raise awareness indirectly through increasing perceived consensus, which enhanced favorable beliefs and hope. These effects varied by collective scientific efficacy—perceived ability of scientists to work together effectively. Belief-based pathways were stronger under low efficacy, while hope-based pathways were stronger under high efficacy. Findings underscore the value of combining consensus and efficacy cues in science communication to promote engagement with emerging technologies like AI.

Science Communication
Texas Tech University (US), Stony Brook University (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.