We Are the Data, but Never the Researchers: Epistemic Violence in the Study of Technology-Facilitated Abuse

This article presents an auto-ethnographic analysis of research on technology-facilitated abuse affecting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, grounded in the author's experience as an Indigenous scholar working across academic, policy, and funding institutions. Indigenous women experience disproportionate levels of online harassment, image-based abuse, surveillance, and algorithmic profiling, yet are excluded from shaping research agendas, funding decisions, and policy responses. Key institutional processes governing technology-facilitated abuse research are opaque by design and inaccessible to conventional empirical methods. Auto-ethnography is therefore used to expose how settler institutions extract Indigenous experiences as data, accumulate funding and prestige, and reproduce colonial research economies that deny Indigenous authority over knowledge. Drawing on Critical Indigenous Studies and Indigenous feminist scholarship, the article argues that technology-facilitated abuse reflects settler-colonial logics embedded in research governance. It calls for Indigenous leadership, data sovereignty, and relational accountability as foundations for ethical research and meaningful reform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of sociology
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261423228
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
58.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

We Are the Data, but Never the Researchers: Epistemic Violence in the Study of Technology-Facilitated Abuse

Bronwyn Carlson
1 citations
Journal of sociology
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
58.49
article

We Are the Data, but Never the Researchers: Epistemic Violence in the Study of Technology-Facilitated Abuse

Bronwyn Carlson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article presents an auto-ethnographic analysis of research on technology-facilitated abuse affecting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, grounded in the author's experience as an Indigenous scholar working across academic, policy, and funding institutions. Indigenous women experience disproportionate levels of online harassment, image-based abuse, surveillance, and algorithmic profiling, yet are excluded from shaping research agendas, funding decisions, and policy responses. Key institutional processes governing technology-facilitated abuse research are opaque by design and inaccessible to conventional empirical methods. Auto-ethnography is therefore used to expose how settler institutions extract Indigenous experiences as data, accumulate funding and prestige, and reproduce colonial research economies that deny Indigenous authority over knowledge. Drawing on Critical Indigenous Studies and Indigenous feminist scholarship, the article argues that technology-facilitated abuse reflects settler-colonial logics embedded in research governance. It calls for Indigenous leadership, data sovereignty, and relational accountability as foundations for ethical research and meaningful reform.

Journal of sociology
Macquarie University (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
58.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.