Palliative Care in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Evaluation of Healthcare Workers’ Awareness and Attitudes

Objective: Palliative care plays a critical role in improving quality of life for patients with life-limiting illnesses; however, misconceptions, educational gaps, and emerging technological challenges continue to affect its clinical implementation. This study aimed to evaluate healthcare professionals’ awareness and attitudes toward palliative care and to explore their perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in palliative care practice. Method: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted between September 1 and 30, 2025, among healthcare professionals working in tertiary care hospitals. A structured questionnaire, developed through literature review and expert consultation, was administered to physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals. The questionnaire included items on palliative care awareness and attitudes, as well as perceptions of AI applications. Content validity was confirmed (=0.88), and internal consistency was satisfactory (Cronbach’s α=0.82-0.86). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 337 participants were included in the analysis (response rate: 96.3%). Most participants demonstrated high awareness of palliative care principles, with 91.6% correctly identifying quality of life improvement as its primary goal. The majority rejected misconceptions that palliative care is limited to terminal stages (73.8%) or oncology patients (88.1%). Despite this, 49.6% reported insufficient training in opioid use, and 19.8% felt inadequately prepared for difficult patient-family conversations. Attitudes toward AI showed a heterogeneous distribution: 37.7% supported broader AI implementation, while 45.7% remained undecided. Concerns regarding patient confidentiality (86.7%) and loss of empathy (54.0%) were prominent, although most participants expressed willingness to receive training on AI applications. Conclusion: Healthcare professionals demonstrated generally positive awareness of palliative care; however, important gaps persist in clinical competencies such as opioid management and communication skills. AI offers potential benefits for palliative care delivery, but ethical concerns highlight the need for cautious, human-centered integration supported by structured education and governance frameworks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bagcilar Medical Bulletin
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4274/bmb.galenos.2026.58076
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Palliative Care in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Evaluation of Healthcare Workers’ Awareness and Attitudes

Sezen Kumaş Solak, Ceren Gür
Bagcilar Medical Bulletin
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Palliative Care in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Evaluation of Healthcare Workers’ Awareness and Attitudes

Sezen Kumaş Solak, Ceren Gür
article en

Abstract

Objective: Palliative care plays a critical role in improving quality of life for patients with life-limiting illnesses; however, misconceptions, educational gaps, and emerging technological challenges continue to affect its clinical implementation. This study aimed to evaluate healthcare professionals’ awareness and attitudes toward palliative care and to explore their perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in palliative care practice. Method: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted between September 1 and 30, 2025, among healthcare professionals working in tertiary care hospitals. A structured questionnaire, developed through literature review and expert consultation, was administered to physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals. The questionnaire included items on palliative care awareness and attitudes, as well as perceptions of AI applications. Content validity was confirmed (=0.88), and internal consistency was satisfactory (Cronbach’s α=0.82-0.86). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 337 participants were included in the analysis (response rate: 96.3%). Most participants demonstrated high awareness of palliative care principles, with 91.6% correctly identifying quality of life improvement as its primary goal. The majority rejected misconceptions that palliative care is limited to terminal stages (73.8%) or oncology patients (88.1%). Despite this, 49.6% reported insufficient training in opioid use, and 19.8% felt inadequately prepared for difficult patient-family conversations. Attitudes toward AI showed a heterogeneous distribution: 37.7% supported broader AI implementation, while 45.7% remained undecided. Concerns regarding patient confidentiality (86.7%) and loss of empathy (54.0%) were prominent, although most participants expressed willingness to receive training on AI applications. Conclusion: Healthcare professionals demonstrated generally positive awareness of palliative care; however, important gaps persist in clinical competencies such as opioid management and communication skills. AI offers potential benefits for palliative care delivery, but ethical concerns highlight the need for cautious, human-centered integration supported by structured education and governance frameworks.

Bagcilar Medical Bulletin
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.