Punishments Enhance Reward Learning by Modulating Striatal Prediction Errors

People often make decisions in contexts where rewards and punishments co-occur, yet most human research still examines reward and punishment learning as independent processes. Here, across three studies, we address this gap by demonstrating that punishments amplify reward learning and its neural correlates in healthy human participants. In Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 102, 69 females and 33 males), participants performed a probabilistic learning task involving monetary rewards and punishments presented in either intermixed or separated contexts. In intermixed contexts, punishments enhanced reward learning accompanied by changes in computational parameters, including higher learning rates from reward prediction errors. In Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 26, 18 females and 8 males), fMRI revealed that punishments amplified reward prediction errors signals in the caudate. Study 3, an fMRI meta-analysis, confirmed that striatal reward responses are consistently stronger when punishments are present. Across studies, we found no reciprocal enhancement of punishment learning by rewards. Together, these findings demonstrate that punishments sharpen reward learning through striatal modulation and underscore the extent to which reward learning is influenced by its broader outcome context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1631-25.2026
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Punishments Enhance Reward Learning by Modulating Striatal Prediction Errors

M.G. Philiastides, F. Queirazza, F. Yao, L. Pesonen et al.
Journal of Neuroscience
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Punishments Enhance Reward Learning by Modulating Striatal Prediction Errors

M.G. Philiastides, F. Queirazza, F. Yao, L. Pesonen, R. Zheng, J. Baldaque, J. Carvalheiro
article en

Abstract

People often make decisions in contexts where rewards and punishments co-occur, yet most human research still examines reward and punishment learning as independent processes. Here, across three studies, we address this gap by demonstrating that punishments amplify reward learning and its neural correlates in healthy human participants. In Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 102, 69 females and 33 males), participants performed a probabilistic learning task involving monetary rewards and punishments presented in either intermixed or separated contexts. In intermixed contexts, punishments enhanced reward learning accompanied by changes in computational parameters, including higher learning rates from reward prediction errors. In Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 26, 18 females and 8 males), fMRI revealed that punishments amplified reward prediction errors signals in the caudate. Study 3, an fMRI meta-analysis, confirmed that striatal reward responses are consistently stronger when punishments are present. Across studies, we found no reciprocal enhancement of punishment learning by rewards. Together, these findings demonstrate that punishments sharpen reward learning through striatal modulation and underscore the extent to which reward learning is influenced by its broader outcome context.

Journal of NeuroscienceVol. 46(12)
Central European University (AT), University College London (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Wellcome Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.