High-flow nasal-cannula oxygen therapy in intensive-care-unit patients: a prospective multicenter observational cohort study (OHE-REA)

High-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) has become the most common oxygen-supplementation modality in patients with acute respiratory failure, based chiefly on data from tightly selected patients included in randomized trials. Our objective was to obtain real-life data on HFOT failure. This prospective observational multicenter French study done in 13 intensive care units in 2019–2020 was designed to determine the proportion of patients with failed HFOT, defined as intubation, noninvasive ventilation, standard oxygen therapy with an estimated FiO2>50%. We included 257 patients before prematurely ending the study due to the COVID-19 pandemic. HFOT failed in 79 patients (32%), including 42 (17%) who required intubation. Mean HFOT duration was 2.4 ± 2.2 days. By multivariate analysis, a low ROX index (ratio of pulse-oximeter saturation (SpO2) over FiO2, over the respiratory rate (RR) was associated with HFOT failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.83; 95%CI, 0.77–0.90, P < 0.0001), as were elevated mean arterial pressure (aHR, 1.03; 95%CI, 1.02–1.05), vasopressor therapy (aHR, 3.35; 95%CI, 1.44–7.79), and worse Glasgow Coma Scale score (aHR, 0.69; 95%CI, 0.57–0.80, P < 0.001). The identification of factors independently associated with HFOT failure should help to determine which patients are most likely to benefit from HFOT, thereby preventing delayed intubation. Additional studies are needed to further assess these risk factors and to determine the optimal HFOT weaning modalities. Trial registration: The study was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov registry on February 11, 2019 (NCT04141956).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39969-4
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-flow nasal-cannula oxygen therapy in intensive-care-unit patients: a prospective multicenter observational cohort study (OHE-REA)

Agathe Delbove, A. Le Thuaut, J Reignier, D. Du Cheyron et al.
Scientific Reports
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

High-flow nasal-cannula oxygen therapy in intensive-care-unit patients: a prospective multicenter observational cohort study (OHE-REA)

Agathe Delbove, A. Le Thuaut, J Reignier, D. Du Cheyron, Bertrand Sauneuf, Julien Cadiet, Maud Jonas, Karim Lakhal, Paul Compagne, Toufik Kamel, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, Jean Morin, Christophe Guitton
article en

Abstract

High-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) has become the most common oxygen-supplementation modality in patients with acute respiratory failure, based chiefly on data from tightly selected patients included in randomized trials. Our objective was to obtain real-life data on HFOT failure. This prospective observational multicenter French study done in 13 intensive care units in 2019–2020 was designed to determine the proportion of patients with failed HFOT, defined as intubation, noninvasive ventilation, standard oxygen therapy with an estimated FiO2>50%. We included 257 patients before prematurely ending the study due to the COVID-19 pandemic. HFOT failed in 79 patients (32%), including 42 (17%) who required intubation. Mean HFOT duration was 2.4 ± 2.2 days. By multivariate analysis, a low ROX index (ratio of pulse-oximeter saturation (SpO2) over FiO2, over the respiratory rate (RR) was associated with HFOT failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.83; 95%CI, 0.77–0.90, P < 0.0001), as were elevated mean arterial pressure (aHR, 1.03; 95%CI, 1.02–1.05), vasopressor therapy (aHR, 3.35; 95%CI, 1.44–7.79), and worse Glasgow Coma Scale score (aHR, 0.69; 95%CI, 0.57–0.80, P < 0.001). The identification of factors independently associated with HFOT failure should help to determine which patients are most likely to benefit from HFOT, thereby preventing delayed intubation. Additional studies are needed to further assess these risk factors and to determine the optimal HFOT weaning modalities. Trial registration: The study was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov registry on February 11, 2019 (NCT04141956).

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Université de Tours (FR), Université d'Orléans (FR), Inserm (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon (FR), Clinical Investigation Center Plurithematic Tours (FR), Centre hospitalier Bretagne Atlantique (FR), Centre Hospitalier du Mans (FR), Centre hospitalier universitaire d'Orléans (FR), Centre Hospitalier Public du Cotentin (FR), Hôpital Foch (FR), Centre Hospitalier Saint-Nazaire (FR), French Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (FR), Nantes Université (FR), Université de Caen Normandie (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.