Multiple Paths to Healing: A Narrative Review of Hippocratic, Traditional Chinese, Ayurvedic, and Modern Western Medical Traditions

This paper presents a narrative review comparing four different practices of medicine: Hippocratic Medicine, Ayurveda, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), and Modern Western Medicine. Six keyword-based searches were conducted using Google Scholar and PubMed between May 2025 and November 2025, yielding 25 records, of which 17 were included based on relevance and thematic alignment. Sources were analyzed across three domains: core values, the role of the provider, and the role of the patient, to conduct an accurate analysis. The results indicate that Hippocratic Medicine emphasized observation, prevention, and ethical practice, forming the ethical and scientific foundation for Modern Western Medicine. In contrast, TCM and Ayurveda emphasize holistic balance, prevention, and harmony between body, spirit, and everyday lifestyle. Modern Western Medicine prioritizes evidence-based, targeted interventions and technological precision. While all systems aim to treat disease and promote patient well-being, these different practices diverge in their core values and treatment methods. This research suggests potential areas where holistic perspectives may complement biomedical practices of Modern Western Medicine today.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scholarly review .
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70121/001c.158297
Primary Topic
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiple Paths to Healing: A Narrative Review of Hippocratic, Traditional Chinese, Ayurvedic, and Modern Western Medical Traditions

Elaina Huang
Scholarly review .
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
article

Multiple Paths to Healing: A Narrative Review of Hippocratic, Traditional Chinese, Ayurvedic, and Modern Western Medical Traditions

Elaina Huang
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a narrative review comparing four different practices of medicine: Hippocratic Medicine, Ayurveda, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), and Modern Western Medicine. Six keyword-based searches were conducted using Google Scholar and PubMed between May 2025 and November 2025, yielding 25 records, of which 17 were included based on relevance and thematic alignment. Sources were analyzed across three domains: core values, the role of the provider, and the role of the patient, to conduct an accurate analysis. The results indicate that Hippocratic Medicine emphasized observation, prevention, and ethical practice, forming the ethical and scientific foundation for Modern Western Medicine. In contrast, TCM and Ayurveda emphasize holistic balance, prevention, and harmony between body, spirit, and everyday lifestyle. Modern Western Medicine prioritizes evidence-based, targeted interventions and technological precision. While all systems aim to treat disease and promote patient well-being, these different practices diverge in their core values and treatment methods. This research suggests potential areas where holistic perspectives may complement biomedical practices of Modern Western Medicine today.

Scholarly review .Vol. Scholarly Debut(Spring 2026)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.